Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You're A Tree and I'm a Baloon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're A Tree and I'm a Baloon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NSONG since the only assertion to notability I can find is this. If it's a standalone single it doesn't appear to have charted or garnered significant coverage or reviews. The album's article lacks any supporting references as to its notability as well. §FreeRangeFrog 20:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 20:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is not notable, with no sources. EM64T (talk) 21:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Not notable, and Balloon is spelled wrong. Page appears almost as if done on a dare. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, the 'Baloon' spelling in the song name is correct. It's a deliberate misspelling. The song does exist and seems to be nearly always referred to with that spelling. Even so, it's not notable. --EM64T (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 14:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.