Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands bus routes 340, 341 and 342
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- West Midlands bus routes 340, 341 and 342 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphan, no sources. Not notable as far as I can see. aycliffetalk 07:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article's content is still unverified five years after its creation and there's no evidence that significant coverage of these routes (or the 40 and 41, which they were renumbered to according to the article) exists. Routine coverage such as bus timetables and trivial mentions isn't enough to meet guidelines. Peter James (talk) 16:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom & Peter James - Non notable list! →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per precedent. We had a mass cull of bus route articles a few months ago. This was evidently missed. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.