- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WEC 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original PROD for no significant coverage in reliable sources was deleted without explanation. Peter Rehse (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. And will restore WEC 18 also. It's a event of significant organization World Extreme Cagefighting. Why we need in deletion only WEC 6? Why not WEC 5 or WEC 7. I think we must keep all or delete all 53 events. NickSt (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Its a good point but like UFC events not all are created equal. If there is significant coverage it should be kept. Use the AfD debate to help decide what is best.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:SPORTSEVENT as the article lacks "well sourced prose" and is "merely a list of stats". --TreyGeek (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Also WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and this is a WP:Pointy vote and this is not a democracy. Mazter00 (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.