Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trigonometry mnemonics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This listing has limited value. Yes, listing a couple mnemonics might be valuable to someone trying to learn the trignometric ratios, but there are already a few listed on Mnemonic. There are an infinite number of mnemonics you could make so it is pointless to have a separate article for them. Only the most well-known ones should be listed, in the Mnemonic article, not a separate one. SCHZMO ✍ 15:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Way too much OR here. anything noteworthy can be mentioned at Mnemonic per User:Schzmo. Ydam 15:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:OR, per nom. Sandstein 18:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Remove the unsourced entries. Then observe that the page is blank. Then delete it. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Some Odd Handle Can Always Help To Organise Algebra. But there are enough in mnemonic already. Gandalf61 09:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mnemonics Never Elevate Marks Of Non-Interested Calculus Students. Dmharvey 02:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Mnemonic, or Delete. (I suppose it would need to be kept as a redirect to preserve the history, if anything is actually merged, but I wish there was a way of doing otherwise.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.