Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taku bullion coin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taku bullion coin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Poor references. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 15:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom on failing the GNG. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per non Devokewater (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am Coinfused. Are coins automatically notable, or do they need to satisfy WP:SIGCOV? Bearian (talk) 03:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.