Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergoal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - PeaceNT (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Supergoal

Previously nominated with decision to Keep on 28 September 2006. Since, there has been no meaningful development of the article, though both contributors to the debate said that sources/references were needed and it has been so tagged since October 2006. Despite the original decision, I think this article amounts to little more than a dicdef of a neologism, albeit one with some use, but it is far from being an encyclopaedic article. I doubt it ever can be, given the 15 months chance it has had. Emeraude (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

(Procedural nom on behalf of Emeraude, No opinion on deletion) UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 15:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reads like a mix between a dictionary article and some company spiel--Jac16888 (talk) 16:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete extended dictionary definition. Unsourced, and fairly unencyclopedic. Maybe the folks at Wiktionary would like it? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 16:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - D.M.N. (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ronnotel (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and transwiktionary as Neologism per WP:NEO. If being added to Wiktionary, please note that they have a list specifically for neologisms as well as a Friendly reminder not to create entries directly for protologisms. When I googled this term, I found some interesting reading about the term supergoal as it relates to artificial intelligence, but it's in a lexicon, not an encyclopedia, furthering my opinion to delete. Cheers, Keeper | 76 17:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:Neo ThuranX (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Carnildo (talk) 04:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.