Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sett R.J.J. High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep & Improve. Tawker 21:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seth R.J.J. High School

Delete: completely non notable, no info provided, no location mentioned etc--Light current 00:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & improve See:Navsari District. While the article is not NPOV, and is a stub, but all schools are notable... Dp462090 | Talk | Contrib | 00:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --rogerd 01:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, kids google their schools, if a Wiki article comes up, they contribute, they become Wiki editors, etc. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 02:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Because of course no kid would ever google any other topic that would lead to a Wikipedia article? Wikipedia is well known now, we don't need to 'advertise' like this. Average Earthman 20:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not seem to be notable. Thus, it seems as though the article cannot get longer because there is just nothing else to say. AmbExThErMaL 02:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there seems to be a tendency to tolerate high school articles. -Objectivist-C 07:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; notable not only because of its age but also because of the circumstances of its founding (by Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy, a very wealthy trader and philanthropist and the first Indian baronet). - Humansdorpie 09:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Notable high school. Piccadilly 16:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reasons stated by Sherurcij Rklawton 17:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and attempt to improve. Delete only if the latter is not possible. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
week delete unless it's expanded immediately. It currently has no sources and makes a claim that may or may not be true. This is not a good stub. ---J.Smith 18:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete soley because of non-verifiability. If sources are added, disregard my vote. The precedent is to keep all verifiable schools, especially high schools. But, the policy is to delete anything unverifiable. -Rob 20:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- unverifiable, not unverified. Why are deletionists so impatient? CalJW 02:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pending verification Jcuk 22:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Knucmo2 22:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a school. For great justice. 22:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, 92 mentions in Google. Quatloo 23:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just give up this disruptive time wasting please. CalJW 02:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Easy now, its better to assume good faith on the part of any voter for this article. --Knucmo2 09:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into district per WP:SCHOOL Paul Cyr 04:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pending verification as per Jcuk. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(esperanza) 2006-04-21 13:40
Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 17:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Worth pursuing. Needs a lot of work though.--Cini 18:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.