Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian Youth League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Serbian Youth League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails organization notability test. References included in the article never actually directly mention the "league" and the matter does not have "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources". Original research is carried out by the individual who created the article and who is possibly affiliated with the group. Instances of plagiarism are also present. The sole reference (recently put in by Antidiskriminator) that mentions the organization is trivial coverage with a passing mention of the organization to identify a quoted person.◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 14:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, delete. --UrbanVillager (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes delete this. They are not notable. --Shorthate (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; short of notability, and likely inherent problems of neutrality. This organisation was supposedly founded by "Boris Malagurski", who seems to have a talent for self-promotion; the article was created and mostly edited by socks of Bormalagurski (talk · contribs). bobrayner (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG. —Theopolisme 05:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.