- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- SerLea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article sourced only to a photo of this gun. I couldn't find reliable sources to support the material. Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax The only sources of information for this gun is Wikipedia itself and a very poor quality image from Imageshack that looks like it has been photoshopped. This appears to be a hoax and should be removed immediately.--RAF910 (talk) 22:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I've got nothing on this one.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources found. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 02:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.