- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as hoax. Rudget. 14:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Schwarky-talkie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I can't find any evidence that this actually exists and think it likely that this is a rather puerile hoax. However, I can't be sure so I am listing it here. Mattinbgn\talk 12:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a hoax. Article claims it's sold by Dick Smith Electronics and Tandy, but neither of their websites knows about it. JohnCD (talk) 12:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a hoax to me as well. I can't find anything except wiki mirrors. Being an Aussie you would think I'd have heard about these if fair dinkum? Looks like a pork pie though. Sting_au Talk 12:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' – Could find no information. Shoessss | Chat 12:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. Twenty Years 12:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – codswallop --Melburnian (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete stupid hoax. I'd also suggest adding it to WP:DAFT Doc Strange (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.