Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Evans (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 15:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Evans

(Note: the prior AfD (which resulted in deletion) was not as to the same Russell Evans.) This Pastor Russell Evans doesn't seem notable enough independent of his ministry. Delete and redirect to Planetshakers. --Nlu (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Longhair\^talk 12:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Nlu. STORMTRACKER 94 12:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested, as he doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable by himself. Lankiveil (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete but don't redirect - not sufficiently notableand not an uncommon name as per previous AfD for another person.--Matilda ^talk 05:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Redirecting would mean that, if and when another Russell Evans warrants his own article, whoever creates that article will be on notice to create a disambiguation page and/or at least use {{dablink}}. --Nlu (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Matilda. Orderinchaos 08:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - trivial media coverage Addhoc (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.