Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProFusion Imaging Expo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spinning Spark 12:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ProFusion Imaging Expo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert without enough salvageable content Corporate 14:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no real evidence of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Advertising without being so bad as to be a speedy, but still spam nonetheless. There is no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.