Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictions made by Ray Kurzweil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 13:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Predictions made by Ray Kurzweil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, the article is almost purely cobbled together from primary source predictions and independent sources either confirming or denying the prediction coming true, usually without any reference to Kurzweil. We do not dedicate separate articles to predictions made by individuals, which incidentally gives this article a silly level of prominence (prior to nominating for deletion, it is a top suggested result when you type in "Predictions"). signed, Rosguill talk 03:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 03:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.