Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenGL Mathematics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 03:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OpenGL Mathematics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N. The two "references" do not describe the article's topic at all. The sources I could find online are mostly forums, StackOverflow and a Wikibook. To be fair, the package is listed in a page about add-on libraries on opengl.org, but I wouldn't consider that enough for N. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into GLSL, which in my opinion should be renamed OpenGL Shading Language. Not HOW TO so remove code (this is a pretty narrowly used package I think?). W Nowicki (talk) 15:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 23:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - press "books" or "scholar" at the top of this page to find sources... Christian75 (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (₵) 01:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Not mentioned in the standard OpenGL references. There is one good cite on google books; in my opinion, that's not sufficient for notability per WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.