Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minera Autlan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close, no result. There's a speedy deletion criterion, WP:G5, that applies to articles created by banned users. Without deciding whether these a worthy of G5 or not, this is not the forum for determining whether some article or another is subject to G5. Bring it up on WP:SPI or something, I don't even know. Other than that, if any of these deserve to be deleted for substantive reason, please nominate them individually. A group nom like this is utterly unhelpful. -- Y not? 15:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minera Autlan

– (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article and the other articles I will be listing were created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. The master and their socks have created over 50 articles that have been deleted. I'm looking through all of the articles they have created for those that (1) have not been significantly edited by editors other than socks and sock IPs, (2) either have no references or lack references that establish notability, and (3) for which I have found no reliable sources indicating notability. Some are listed on international stock exchanges, however WP:LISTED is not, by itself, considered to be sufficient for notability. I am not confident that I can determine if these companies are regionally notable, so it may be some of them can be rescued. In any case, because these socks have produced so many non-notable articles, they require scrutiny by the community. I am One of Many (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have added a Part 2 here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIDERPERU and a Part 3 here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minera S.A..--I am One of Many (talk) 06:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the Minera Autlan article. A cursory search of Google News produced a wealth of recent Spanish-language articles from a variety of independent sources. I personally cannot read Spanish, so perhaps it would be best if we had someone who is fluent look this one over to double check, but the company appears to easily meet WP:GNG.NewAccount4Me (talk) 22:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some other articles for which I vote keep and a few relevant citations. Again, someone who speaks Spanish would be very useful in this AfD convo, since most of the media covering these South American companies is written in Spanish. Banco Votorantim is covered on several international news sites here and here for example. Atacocha, with perhaps a move to rename the article Compania Minera Atacocha, they are covered in international news multiple times here and here for example. Others I have a Strong delete for, such as Ufaneftekhim, which may be some sort of scam front article because the actual refinery belongs to Bashneft which isn't even mentioned in the article. Honestly, maybe these should be broken up into separate AfDs since there are so many and they all aren't clear deletes? NewAccount4Me (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an idea which ones might be notable? I'll break them up into two groups. The trouble is I don't speak the relevant languages.I am One of Many (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. NewAccount4Me (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NewAccount4Me (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NewAccount4Me (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.