- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Adema. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark Chavez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability independent of his band Adema. (note that his other band is not notable, the blue link is just a redirect to Adema). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No real opinion on this one, but if it's not found to meet notability standards, it's a no-brainer to redirect, rather than delete. --BDD (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Adema per WP:MUSICBIO. Plausible search term but does not, in my view, have sufficient notability independent of the band to warrant a separate article. Not much worth merging, as the Adema article adequately covers this person's exit/return/re-exit from the group. Gong show 06:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.