Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ring of Honor events (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- List of Ring of Honor events (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is not needed per the XFD of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ECW events, WP is not a directory or a catalog. These ROH events are non notable, we cant list events that occur on consecutive days, that would be like listing every house show that WWE produces. SRX--LatinoHeat 14:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions --SRX--LatinoHeat 14:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. A list of these events does not constitute an article. All of the keeps in the last AfD were some variant of WP:ITSUSEFUL --T-rex 14:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the nominator on the original, and because the last AfD has two legit deletes, two SPA keeps and one keep from Le Grand and so should have been relisted to generate a consensus rather than closed as keep. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- if this were tying together articles on the subject, it would be useful, but very few events are bluelinked.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my reasons in the previous AFD. RobJ1981 (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it should have been done the first time around for reasons established by this nom and the previous one. RFerreira (talk) 17:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the AfD of List of ECW events. -- iMatthew T.C. 15:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per precedent. Nikki311 18:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.