Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet entrepreneurs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 23:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Internet entrepreneurs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List article does not meet WP:NLIST- lacks clearly defined inclusion criteria supported by sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Search results return lists of Internet entrepreneurs by certain categories, especially by wealth, success or country. Among them are [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6], but I don't know if they're good enough for the article to meet WP:NLIST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 05:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One sourced, easily a magnet for non-notables to be thrown onto the list with no scrutiny. The category system works better for a list like this. Nate • (chatter) 00:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per Astig. A clearer criteria for inclusion/focus to the list could be sorted out through editorial consensus on the talk page. 4meter4 (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 23:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We should keep lists which can aid navigation or provide information and I would say the list fits in WP:LISTN. It is not indiscriminate and the list is defined. Lightburst (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.