Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapuso Mo, Jessica Soho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kapuso Mo, Jessica Soho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television show. No coverage in reliable sources, article consists of unverified claims and Facebook links. Drmies (talk) 03:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The show is the leading magazine show in the country, and therefore I have added an citation because every article is required to atleast have one. Angelo6397 (talk) 05:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Right now the article's a bit of a mess, but a long-running (10+ years!) magazine show on a major television network, and which has won several awards (both local and foreign, to my recollection) is probably notable. Granted, most of the sources you'll probably find for the latter are non-independent ones, but the fact is, the show did win awards, which would probably by itself be enough to establish notability, while I remember seeing in one of our notability guidelines that shows that air nationwide on a nationwide network are generally notable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of independent reliable sources around. This is like the Philippine version of Inside Edition, that and Rated K.--RioHondo (talk) 03:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.