- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Consensus is that the topic meets the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 01:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is heavily promotional in tone, fails to cite any independent sources, and is linked to very few other artilces. Google shows just under 1,000 hits, among which I did not spot anything that would be useful as a source. Even though his cabaret career "blossomed" in 1983, and he has an "unusually smooth baritone voice" (lucky chap) I could not find any non-trivial independent sources from which to rewrite the article. Cruftbane 07:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep could probably be a delete by most standards, but it's a well-written article and he does get some ghits. Note the reviews here [1] of his album. If the reviews are verifiable, this should be a (weak) keep. JJL 13:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - agree with JJL. The article is ok and there are enough news and positive reviews [2] [3] [4] (google news) to make a verifyable article based on reliable sources. Seems to meet WP:BIO - Peripitus (Talk) 21:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.