- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Mistaken nomination.Avi (talk) 12:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeff Ballabon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability issues Avi (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is sourced with Haaretz, Forward And the Observer, who all say, not in passing, but in long tiering articles that he is prominent, notable and important to the orthodox Jews and GOP politics in the USA. So notability is the last and least problem here. Never mind the nominator of this AFD hasn't even bothered to vote for Delete, which comes to show how serious his role here is in wikipedia.--יודל (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I put up this deletion discussion in the Jewish wikiproject--יודל (talk) 10:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, surely Avi this is an error on your part? Three serious profiles can be read establishing major notability, not to mention the extensive news coverage this man has had over many years, he is one of the 50 most influencial Jews in the USA. Surely this nomination is in error and shuold be withdrawn? Lobojo (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Objectively meets standard notability criteria, WP:RS specifically say he is notable. End of story. --Shirahadasha (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.