Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeodynamic agriculture (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Homeodynamic agriculture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in high-quality secondary sources to establish notability Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 04:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article is not based on science, so notability can't come from scientific publications. It is not conceptually related to the article Homeodynamics, an article that is in bad shape and a bit on the fringe side but notable. Is this topic covered in any other independent reliable sources? There are none that I can find. There are plenty of unreliable sources and that appears to be it. I am One of Many (talk) 05:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:FRINGE notability guidelines. There is no 3rd party independent notice of this particular off-shoot of biodynamic agriculture that I can see. jps (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - suffers from a common problem with low-notability fringe topics; it's impossible to find sufficient independent sources in order to build neutral content. bobrayner (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. IRWolfie- (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "it was created from the same teachings of Rudolf Steiner that biodynamic agriculture is based upon". No independent sources appear to exist, and it thus fails Wikipedia:FRINGE#Notability. Surprisingly I can't even find many unreliable fringe sources, IRWolfie- (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to see here, move on! There are no reliable sources on this article, absolutely everything is a user-generated or a personal home-page. This topic might even be a candidate for speedy deletion. --Salimfadhley (talk) 23:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable fringe hogwash. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not and must not become the validating source for non-significant subjects. Bishonen | talk 19:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.