Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammar Explorer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Eluchil404 07:29, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Grammar Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Is this notable? Computerjoe's talk 18:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This program has received plenty of attention from the EU, as well as 3 other listed sources to boot. This article is extremely notable, even if you have never heard of it. Panoptical 18:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep looks to be very notable to me and also no real rationale provided by nom for deletion and almost intended to speedy close the discussion right away (but will wait). The notability tag should have been added in the article instead of the Afd tag.--JForget 01:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The notability tag only waitlists the article for "sorting," which would only have someone send the article to AfD later, possibly months later, or to have someone remove the tag later. Just tagging it with notability is a bad idea when notability could be decided now. (By the way, my vote still stands as "keep"). Panoptical 01:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.