Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Douglas-Scott-Montagu, Baroness Montagu of Beaulieu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Edward Douglas-Scott-Montagu, 3rd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu#Marriage and children. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 03:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Douglas-Scott-Montagu, Baroness Montagu of Beaulieu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Non-notable, what little press cited is a local which is only interested in her because of her husband. Notability is not inherited. TheLongTone (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yet curiously enough, one of the sources cited doesn't even mention her husband or the fact that she is married. Are you sure this is the case of inherited notability? Surtsicna (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since I afd'd this article somebody has added a number of references to the article. I've looked at the online ones, and they confirm my contention of non notability: essentially articles about her husband who, unusually for an hereditary member of the House of lords, is actually notable]]. Which is probably why she is Gyles Brandreth's book which is a print reference. Good references for proving she exists, but not to back a claim of notability.TheLongTone (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...Curiously, the editor who took the trouble to expand and further reference the aricle did not consider ading a 'keep' vote to this page.TheLongTone (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. After reading about this lady's work for various international bodies, presumably charities, I reread Wikipedia:Notability (people), as I thought that work might make her notable, but I found that what I had in mind was in the section on politicians. I suggest giving the creator a little time to look around for new sources, in case the general notability guideline can be met. Moonraker (talk) 02:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Edward Douglas-Scott-Montagu, 3rd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu#Marriage and children; there's space there for it and the target article will benefit from the expansion. DrKiernan (talk) 21:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment That seems sensible.TheLongTone (talk) 08:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 10:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge As above. Not independently notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per all of the above; also, wives of minor nobility do not automatically inherit notability. If her charitable work gets more notice, then we can add her back in. Bearian (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.