- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fedora colinux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This has been speedy tagged a couple of times. Bringing this to AfD for community consensus as I know nothing of the subject matter. Procedural nom, abstaining. Keeper | 76 16:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete exists but no news hits and minimal ghits. No assertion of notability. JJL (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article was created by the producer of the product to advertise (see discussion page). Only sources on the web I can find are "new product" listings, which do not evidence any notability. Many of the google hits returned are about colinux with fedora core, not this product. --Jon186 (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems more like promotion of this Linux distro's features than actual content about the operating system. Smells like advertising indeed. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 03:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.