Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FTL: Faster Than Light
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Article easily passes WP:GNG at this time as argumented by the editors. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- FTL: Faster Than Light (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not explain why it is notable. Perhaps it does not does belong in Wikipedia at all? Longbyte1 (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. This article has significant coverage in at least a dozen sources already, and I'm certain there are more out there. Suggest the nominator withdraw the nomination. —Torchiest talkedits 03:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep; as the primary editor, I still need to flesh out the reception section, but clearly there's plenty of secondary references and the like that explain its notability. --MASEM (t) 03:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per the above; plenty of significant coverage exists for this game as evidenced in the article's References section. Gongshow Talk 05:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notability is shown by sources. However the nominator correctly pointed out that the opening should tell us why the game is important, not what it's like to play it. :-) -Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.