Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Reo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Reo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable singer, doesn't satisfy musicbio. scope_creep^Talk 21:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:CREATIVE#3 as the creator of a significant body of work. Her albums have been reviewed in reliable sources like Pitchfork and NPR. pburka (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the cited sources show significant coverage of Reo and/or her work. Also found album reviews in magazines like Glide, New Noise and Ear Buddy all of which show enough coverage Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in addition to WP:MUSICBIO#1 (I added 2013 coverage from Stereogum, a 2016 NPR Music review, a 2019 Paste Magazine review, a 2019 NPR Music review, and 2019 coverage from Broadway World to the article) it also looks like there is support for WP:NMUSICOTHER given the frequency of the coverage, e.g. there is also more from Stereogum in 2016 and 2019, NPR (2015), Pitchfork (2016). Beccaynr (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That is good work. Maybe somebody could update that article. scope_creep^Talk 22:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after WP:HEY above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO per Beccaynr, pburka, and Spiderone's sources.4meter4 (talk) 00:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.