Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edequal Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edequal Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of WP:notability. Malala is notable but this not make this organisation so. Google searches not finding anything significant. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 17:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ( or userfy to creator, if he shows up here ) - I agree with the nominator. Other than having an app', and a mere mention in newsbytes about Malala, sorry. I commend them for what they do do, but the article needs a ref about THEM, please. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 20:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Looks like a small (and thus NN) aid charity that has bandwagoned on what happened to Malala. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 04:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.