Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Shoot the Messenger Demo EP
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Don't Shoot the Messenger Demo EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I declined the A7, because it doesn't apply to music. Added PROD, but article creator put a {{hangon}} tag. I'll WP:AGF and take that as a deletion of the PROD. So, here we go...
As is, it fails WP:MUSIC... horribly. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, you'll note that it appears the band has been Speedied. The album also fails WP:MUSIC. Redfarmer (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Band fails WP:MUSIC, so their album does too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If the band isn't notable enough for an article, their self-published, unsigned, less-than-2000-copies-sold demo album certainly isn't. eaolson (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A7 for bands really should be altered to include this. BLACKKITE 11:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the band was speedied, it's back. But I think demo's are inherently unnotable, even more so for unsigned bands. Dchall1 (talk) 21:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.