- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Agreement that the subject does not meet the notability standard for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Cam O'bi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Had a BLP prod on this but there is a ref now. Anyway I'm not sure about the notability. The creator says they are notable for being with notable people-I don't think that means they are notable though. Wgolf (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as non notable singer, Fails NMUSIC & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 00:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet GNG. Kierzek (talk) 15:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete altogether as none of this is actually convincing of the needed independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. One extremely weak reference, which looks self-published. Willondon (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.