- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus that sources here demonstrate notability exists. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- C. Unniraja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable politician. Fails WP:GNG Kichu🐘 Discuss 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep We already have source in The Hindu, but I think I found more sources.Just look on this other Wikipedia for more sources. One of the sources is no longer in existence, but to me this seems clear that many other sources exist considering he is a leader of a mainstream party in India. I might be willing to change my vote if this isn't enough though. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The only English RS present on the mlwiki is already present in enwiki. Unless somebody is going to translate the other sources we cannot use them here. Vikram Vincent 10:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry it took me a long time to get back to you. I'm a bit confused by your comment. The fact that the sources are not in English does not mean that they do not help determine notability. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom for lack of notability. Vikram Vincent 10:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)CHanging !vote to Keep per Soman and Goldsztajn. Vikram Vincent 16:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)- Keep - considering that this person died in 1995, sourcing is a bit difficult but there is material to indicate notability: "C.Unniraja , veteran communist leader"[1], "C . Unniraja converged on the scene . Among them Unniraja later emerged as a prominent leader of the Communist Party of India ( CPI )"[2], "As early as in March , the Government of India directed the provincial government to segregate the " unmarked " party members from important Communists . The prominent Communists from Malabar segregated in Vellurcentral jail , were K . Damodaran , K . P . R . Gopalan , K . P . Gopalan , Sadhu P . Ahamad Kutty , A . K . Gopalan , C . Unniraja..."[3], his life is covered in detail in works like this https://www.indulekha.com/charitram-rachicha-charitrasakshi-biography-c-unniraja --Soman (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Amity. Indo-Soviet Cultural Society. 1991. p. 10.
- ^ K. Ramachandran Nair (2006). The History of Trade Union Movement in Kerala. Kerala Institute of Labour and Employment. p. 18. ISBN 978-81-7827-138-5.
- ^ K. K. N. Kurup (1989). Agrarian Struggles in Kerala. CBH Publications. p. 83. ISBN 978-81-85381-01-5.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep prominent historical CP member from Kerala. Per sources mentioned by Soman and, FWIW, the CIA considered him noteworthy, too; three mentions in the agency's 1962 survey of the Indian left, including as a factional leader in Kerala.--Goldsztajn (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Goldsztajn if the CIA is looking at you then you definitely are noteworthy :D Vikram Vincent 04:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.