- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Maxim(talk) 02:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blake Parlett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I'm setting this up for User:DMighton, as he requested here.
Contested PROD. PROD reason was "Non-notable hockey bio. Non-Professional junior hockey player, undrafted." Rjd0060 (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as he's non-notable. GoodDay (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. —Rjd0060 (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable junior player, not yet drafted, not a top prospect. Article can be recreated when he plays professionally or if he gets drafted in the first round of the NHL Draft. --Pparazorback (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet criteria for hockey players. --Krm500 (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not notable. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable junior player who does not have any other means of having gained notability. -Djsasso (talk) 15:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not yet notable, as per nom. Risker (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Grsz11 (talk) 03:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.