Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applied Digital Solutions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close. The nominator was proposing a merge, not deletion. This is not handled at AFD. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Applied Digital Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article also exists as Digital Angel. The two should either be merged or this one be deleted. It seems to be outdated. Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And both articles share a single problem: the lack of reliable 3rd party sources demonstrating notability. AllyD (talk) 11:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- sofixit. Yes, they need to be merged. digital Angel is more up to date, but this one is more detailed. That doesn't take AFD. DGG ( talk ) 21:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural close - Proposing a merge does not require a discussion at AFD. -- Whpq (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.