Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijet Raajput

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijet Raajput

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Covert advertising, classic WP:ADMASQ. A case of using what, at first, appears to be news articles to give an illusion of notability. Cited entirely to his own press releases, nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE search. Also, there is no claim to passing WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE. What has he achieved in his career to justify an article?

Telegraph says sponsored content at the bottom. Mid-day labels this as partnered content and has further warnings at the bottom of the article. Tribune is labelled as brand connect. DNA says Disclaimer: This is a Featured Article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nom. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Compelling case in nom. Good job. Gentleman wiki (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "He has Directed and Produced many Ad Films, Brand Films, Punjabi albums, English albums, Fashion Film Videos, short films and Documentaries" statement seems quite advertising , not sated the names of the works as well , Strongly Fails WP:DIRECTOR Rockpeterson (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This does seem to be a case of WP:BROCHURE; sources are non-independent and no notability has been established Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
’’’Keep’’’ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaesingh (talk • contribs) 05:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Lacks WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others, though I do appreciate the term "calendar launch party" for brightening up my day – never a bad reason to celebrate, is there... AngryHarpy‍^talk 06:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no assertion of notability here.Brayan ocaner (talk) 07:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nomination Brayan ocaner (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.