Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/123 Tequila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

123 Tequila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Without secondary sources, there is nothing to indicate that this product meets the notability guideline at WP:PRODUCT. VQuakr (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found this[1]. However, the Wikipedia article reads like a promotion piece, and I'm not finding anything else that substantiates notability. —Theodore! (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unredeemable spam. -- Whpq (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to be notable and is rather spammy. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.