Troyster87
{{Indef}}
Reincarnation of banned user, up to same old tricks. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
{{help}}
Why have I been blocked?Troyster87 (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- {{helpme}} is not for unblock requests. Please use {{unblock}}. Also, see here for why you're banned. //roux 23:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Troyster87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have done nothing to merit deletion, I have only added content, created articles, etc. What is disruptive about my edits?
Decline reason:
Blocks and bans are applied to the person and not the account. You may not simply create a new account to dodge a block placed on a prior account of yours. If you wish to be unblocked, log in to your first blocked account and request an unblock there. Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Troyster87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not the same person however. I am not trying to "dodge" anything. I simply trying to be constructive. I am a new user. This is my first ever account. My name is Troy and I believe this is a case of mistaken identity.
Decline reason:
Sorry, try again.
Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. —Travistalk 02:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Troyster87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry what do you mean nice try? I am being honest here. Can I be given the benefit of the doubt? Couldn't I just happen to share an IP address with someone who previously edited the same article? None of my edits were disruptive, I never violated the 3RR, all I did was nominate an article for deletion. If I were that other user I would have loggon on already and tried to resolve this however, How can I if i'm not I wouldn't know the password and hence would not be able to do it. How may I proceed? I really love editing wikipedia and none of my edits are disruptive.Troyster87 (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DYK for Bay Street Emeryville
edit
|
On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bay Street Emeryville, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
St. David
editSt. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Category:El Sobrante, California has been nominated for renaming
edit
Category:El Sobrante, California has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Natg 19 (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Gwiazdoń has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability whatsoever, fails WP:NNAME and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, no sources present in article, no sources found to indicate notability. Page creator is also now a blocked sockpuppet, if that affects anything.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)