ADV Ocean Shield

edit

Great work with this photo. I think that she has to be the worst-looking ship ever operated by the Royal Australian Navy though! Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

thank you! But I agree, it's not a beauty ;-) --Sputniktilt (talk) 12:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tonnage tax has been accepted

edit
 
Tonnage tax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Suissenégoce

edit

Hello Sputniktilt, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Suissenégoce, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suissenégoce.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@North8000:

Please do not ask for deletion of an article if you are not sure what you are talking about. A little media coverage does not mean a lack of significance:

  • You do not find coverage because Suissnégoce is the new name. They changed their name some weeks ago. Try „Swiss trading and Shipping Association“ or STSA as a search promt and you will discover it.
  • Please check the official business register in order to find out who is behind that organization : the big trading companies. Vitol, Mercuria, Trafigura, ADM, Bunge, Cargil, Dreyfus, aas well as globally active Banks and insurance companies.

To be clear : Suissenégoce is the lobby organization of a big business sector in Switzerland. It is an important player in policymaking, active in Parliament as well as on governmental level.

Feel free to add this information in the article. Otherwise, I will do it sooner or later.

Best , --Sputniktilt (talk) 09:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Sputniktilt: And who should be learning and adding that? The millions of editors or are building the articles or the 50 active NPP'ers who need to review 500 - 1,000 articles per day? Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply