Paperwork69

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JavaHurricane 01:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Housebroken (TV series) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Peter DeLuise. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 17:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

• Claiming that you are "fixing a typo" when you clearly aren't can lead to a block. MarnetteD|Talk 17:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Hordern. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A-Train (The Boys) (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A-Train (The Boys) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A-Train (The Boys), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Paperwork69! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Around the World in a Day. Please do not claim major changes are "fixing a typo". Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at It Can Happen. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Deepak Khazanchi is not credited on any Yes releases. Binksternet (talk) 00:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Michael Richardson. Again with the "fixing a typo". Please stop. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

@Doctorhawkes: He made another such edit long after your last warning above. Seasider53 (talk) 10:58, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shanice. Again you have removed information (for no reason I can see) and claimed it was a typo. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Coldplay48 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Coldplay48. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)