MitchellMatchbox

Welcome!

Hello, MitchellMatchbox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to University of Canterbury. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center. Please note that Wikipedia uses sentence case for headings as per MOS:HEAD.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Schwede66 03:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Minor edits

The vast majority of your edits that are marked as “minor” are not minor edits. Please read Help:Minor edits and until you do, do not mark anything as minor. Schwede66 19:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MitchellMatchbox, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Stuartyeates (talk) 23:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Stuartyeates, I'm quite frankly shocked to see you open a sockpuppet investigation on me. I have no affiliation whatsoever to any of those accounts as I have stated before. I feel as though this a just an attack on my account for having a different opinion when editing the University of Canterbury page. MitchellMatchbox (talk) 00:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

User:MitchellMatchbox If the sockpuppet investigation finds there are no issues, then I'll have egg on my face, won't I? I'm happy to unfollow the article for 24 months if no sockpuppets are found, but there's a history of misbehaviour on the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Michael Cullen (politician) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Nauseous Man (talk) 03:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks will do. Just didn't know what to write as it was a small edit. MitchellMatchbox (talk) 03:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

No worries! Just makes it easier to spot vandalism, because often when people make edits in bad faith they don't put an edit summary. Nauseous Man (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Sentence case

Kia ora MitchellMatchbox, Wikipedia uses sentence case for headings as per WP:SECTIONHEAD. Could you please go back to University of Waikato and drop caps in those headings as needed? Schwede66 06:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Can do! MitchellMatchbox (talk) 07:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cullen328 (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen328 (talk) 00:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:College House Logo + Crest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:College House Logo + Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Canterbury, logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Canterbury, logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi MitchellMatchbox. Thank you for your work on Puaka–James Hight Building. Another editor, Chocmilk03, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page, it's great work (I'm surprised the library didn't have a page already!). Just a reminder to be careful about following the words of sources too closely, as this can lead to copyright issues.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chocmilk03}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Canterbury Law Review (2014 cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canterbury Law Review (2014 cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Ilam page move

Hi, can I ask why you moved Ilam School of Fine Arts to University of Canterbury Faculty of Arts? Diffs [1] and [2] — HTGS (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

I moved it because Ilam School of Fine Arts is a department that makes up the larger Faculty of Arts. I intended it given there would be more information to form one page, rather than two separate pages. This is also more in line with other University Faculty pages. MitchellMatchbox (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok then. It isn’t currently supported by sources about the new topic. Will you continue to update the page? The article pays no attention to the arts faculty at this point. The list of alumni appears to still be exclusively from the school of fine arts, for instance. Categories will need to be updated, and so will the “former names” in the infobox, etc, etc. — HTGS (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

And do you expect to do the same to Elam, or other art schools? — HTGS (talk) 07:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)