DGtal
Bookmobile
editYes, that bookmobile belongs to the Ottawa Public Library, the city's public library. - SimonP 14:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Re:"True church" in Hebrew wiki
editI give my sincere apologies if the church beliefs of my denomination has offended you in any way (I am merely translating our church beliefs into the wonderful and unique Hebrew language). Perhaps you can help change the phrase "Our Lord" to "The Lord Jesus" to make it more consistent.
Regards --Jose77 09:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am not offended by the contents. The problem was the use of the first person terminology, which implies the reader is a co-believer, which is not always true. I will try to fix the phrasing a bit. DGtal 09:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Great, thanks.
editYes, you were too quick for me. I added the interwiki link a few minutes before I saved the English article, hence for a brief period of time it had no target. Anyway, happy it's all good now. Thanks for being on top of things! Kol tuv. Dfass 19:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Your contact info
editHi DGtal: You have not enabled your Wikipedia Email feature in your "tool box" on the left hand side of your user page. Sometimes editors overlook that when it's a useful way of staying in touch with other editors. Best wishes. Shabbat Shalom, IZAK 13:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't too much in the English Wiki except interwiki, but I will enable it. Shabbat Shalom, DGtal 22:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Peter Atkins divorce date
editHello, I changed the divorce date because I noticed that it was orginally given as 2005 on the Atkins article, but 2003 on his ex-wife's (Susan Greenfield) article. The Observer seems to imply that they divorced in 2003 ("Susan has lived here since 2003, after her highly publicised divorce from fellow Oxford professor Peter Atkins.") This site says that they announced their "impending divorce" in 2003. - Gemtiger 21:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I appreciate your checking, and I'll go change it on Greenfield's page as well. - Gemtiger 22:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Scholem photo
editThanks a lot for putting Scholem's photo back where it belonged. warshy 13:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- No prob. DGtal 14:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Military-Insignia
editTemplate:Military-Insignia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Megapixie 02:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nomination. I added my comments. DGtal 07:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi David,
- I replaces this with a free use image I found on Flickr of Rabbi Jonathan Sacks. I suggest you get this one deleted...
Thanks for finding and uploading it! I've now deleted the above. Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 00:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Request for revision
editI think if you went ahead and changed it to a "do not use this template, please find a more appropriate template, such as one listed below", no one would object. It seemed to be a reasonably accepted solution in the debate. ^demon[omg plz] 15:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I just referred to information within the Wikipedia – I found other articles in the encyclopedia with much less information so I don't understand your request... Louis88 16:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
דיגי!
editNo worries. It was a mess, and the inclusion of the stand-ins in the list was annoying me. I also intend to remove the President boxes from their articles and replace them with the standard MK one. Number 57 08:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I personally don't like MK templates in President pages. It's a different type of position. DGtal 10:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- I meant from the stand-ins (e.g. Yosef Sprinzak). Number 57 19:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- In that case, I happily agree. You can of course add it as his top job. DGtal 19:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh, God, I can't believe I forgot that!Therequiembellishere 13:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- In that case, I happily agree. You can of course add it as his top job. DGtal 19:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I meant from the stand-ins (e.g. Yosef Sprinzak). Number 57 19:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Jewish Gordons
editIf you have anymore information about the history of the Jewish Gordons I would be very interested to hear it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScrollMaker (talk • contribs) 22:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- There is no one history, as most Jewish Gordon's are not related. Most of them got the name from Eastern Europe, but in my case the name probably came from a bottle of Gin. DGtal (talk) 06:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, you could translate in Hebrew the article Fritz Muliar and in Yiddish the articles Martin Weinek and Fritz Muliar? I thank you in advance!
editGood morning to you, Greetings from Campora San Giovanni. I write you regarding these articles, one if you can write in Hebrew and Yiddish: Muliar in fact it is of Jewish religion, grown with a Jewish stepfather of Russian origin. He fluently speaks over the German and the English, also the Hebrew and the Yiddish one. Therefore before him footsteps to good life, would want that he read or if not he doesn't know how to use the computer they made to read its biography in Hebrew and Yiddish, it is at work one worth of his that has done during the Second World war. For Weinek (or Vaynek) he is also an actor of the Kommissar Rex, but toward of him I feed a great respect in his comparisons. I would also want for him one biography of his in Yiddish, even if it is Christian. Could you do me this favor kindly? I will reciprocate the favor translating in Italian and Sicilian: a biography or a geographical article to your liking, in the Wikipedia Italiana they are biographer and geographer. In attends him of one certain answer of yours I in advance thank you and I offer you the regards from Campora San Giovanni, my village native. I thank you once more!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. My Yiddish level is very low, so I cannot translate to or from it. About Fritz Muliar - I am far from the subject of acting, so I cannot create a reasonable tarnslation. Sorry, DGtal (talk) 13:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Re: Category:Islam in the United States
edit- Category:Islam in the United States - partly about relationship between US govt. and Islam as religion
Hi, there. I removed your addition of Category:Islam in the United States to Barack Obama speech at Cairo University, 2009. I don't think the article really fits that category (and I watched the speech live and read the transcript). Per the previous press briefing by Robert Gibbs, "The speech will be about America's relations with the Muslim world." It's not about or focused on Islam in the United States. Yes, references to the American tradition of freedom of religion and the standard of living and practice of Muslims in the United States was briefly mentioned, but that isn't the main theme. If you feel strongly about this, let me know. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining your point of view, which is logical and therefore correct. If you happen to ever create Category:Islam and the United States the speech could fit in. Good day. DGtal (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Chabad Library
editThen feel free to move it to the proper name if you think that's the name. I moved it from where it was because "Chabad library" was clearly wrong and one of the sources used used the form I used. 01:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Interwiki
editI saw you removed the interwiki from Ani Ma'amin. It was correct, but there is a problem with the rendition of the brackets from the Hebrew. Try this link. Perhaps you have any idea how to fix the interwiki? Debresser (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- The iw was incorrect. The article in hebrew is to a song by Shaul Tchernichovsky, but the english article takes about a song/line based on Rambam's 13 principles. BTW, the general solution to iw brackets is writing [[he: and the "copy paste" the he articles name. DGtal (talk) 08:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're right. Thanks. Debresser (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
editDisambiguation link notification for August 30
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zvi Ofer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medal of Valor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Rafiah Yam
editIn the article Rafiah Yam you have twice removed the category Villages depopulated during the Arab–Israeli conflict. It is consistently in every former Gush Katif village. Why should this one be done differently than all the others? - Galatz (talk) 13:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- It shouldn't. I believe the category should be removed from all those articles, but in practice I only notices this one. If I am incorrect the category should include over 400 articles now in the various subcategories of the category we are discussing. DGtal (talk) 13:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello. When adding an entry to the Deaths page, please remember to also add a source, if available. If one is not, you may ask for assistance at the talk page. Thank you. — Wyliepedia 11:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- In this case there is a problem. I know from a 200% reliable source (a family member) he passed away this morning but very sadly no local site has as yet run a story about it. DGtal (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Do you have a source for the party being disestablished in 1981? Cheers, Number 57 11:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The article says it lost in the 1981 elections and I saw nowhere any sign of later activity. Note that before 1992 party lists and Knesset factions were not necessarily attached to a legal entity, so when the list loses never to return it's game over. DGtal (talk) 11:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
editPlease refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:State of Palestine for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, DGtal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Yael Dowker
edit"Hello, can you provide a source relating to the death of Yael Dowker?"
I'm not sure if this is the correct way to reply - sorry if it's not!
I was a friend of Yael, and I am also a friend of her daughter - Ann Dowker at Oxford University. Ann and Yael eschewed any publicity generally, and Ann took that approach when her mother died.
Hope that helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peetm (talk • contribs) 10:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I guess that will have to do for the time being. DGtal (talk) 22:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of A History of the Palestinian People
editHello! Your submission of A History of the Palestinian People at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dahn (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Dahn, tis is my first nomination so QPQ doesn't apply. Thanks, DGtal (talk) 10:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
editHello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/A History of the Palestinian People at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, DGtal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Eliana Rubashkyn. Rubashkyn's connection
editEliana is the Daughter of Tamara who is the Daughter of Ida Rafailovna Rubashkina, in my sthetl.com in Zhytomyr, in Godorok Belarus is registered the sister of Ida who is Haya Rafailovna Rubashkina partner of Shmuel Auntie in law of Aharon Rubashkin begginer of the Rubashkin dinasty in Iowa.
Ida was an Holocaust survivor. https://yvng.yadvashem.org/nameDetails.html?language=en&itemId=6731447&ind=3
The Shteytl record of Haya Rubashkina http://shtetle.com/Shtetls/gorodok/gor_syn_eng.html Golan38 (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks @Golan38:. If I understand correctly Eliana and Aaron Rubashkin are second cousins. Please add info and references to all 3 articles. Thanks, DGtal (talk) 09:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, DGtal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, DGtal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Karai/Karhi
editCome on, you should really know better than to move an article midway through an RM. Number 57 12:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- I prefered the Wikipedia:Be bold approach in this case. It was a clear and cut case. DGtal (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bobover-45
editA tag has been placed on Bobover-45 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Redirect to redirect, no page links to it
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. תנא קמא (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editSpeedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 disestablishments in Israel
editA tag has been placed on Category:2020 disestablishments in Israel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 disestablishments in Israel
editA tag has been placed on Category:2020 disestablishments in Israel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Political organizations disestablished in 2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
editHello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Around the World in Eighty Days, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV; you're welcome to reinsert your information with a third-party source. DonIago (talk) 19:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Doniago, what should I do if the vast majority of sources are either people or promotions related to the show, music databases (1999 album, 2007 album on spotify for example) or secondary databases? If I add a link to the youtube upload of the video of the show is that enough (1999 version, 2007 version)? Thanks, DGtal (talk) 06:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- If no secondary sources have discussed the show (i.e. reviews or otherwise a decent discussion of it), then I would argue that it's not significant enough for inclusion. DonIago (talk) 08:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's a Hanukka show - around this Jewish holiday there is a multitude of shows in Israelfor kids, mostly unrelated to the actual holiday that run sometimes dozens of times in a couple of weeks, then vanish till next year (the Festigal has been doing it for 40 years). This show has been successful enough to be in stage multiple years (just found a 2021 production reference) so I think is is notable. DGtal (talk) 08:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- If it's that significant then it would seem to follow that there should be seconary sources that have discussed it, yes? DonIago (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's not significant as in something I would discuss in a theatre course or write a paper about. I is significant in the sense of a musical that was seen live by tens of thousands and later by many more on TV, video and streaming and having the soundtrack heard years later on music apps. DGtal (talk) 07:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- From how you're describing it, it still sounds as though some secondary source somewhere should have found it significant enough to talk about at some point, though? I'm not expecting an entire essay about it or such, but musicals do get talked about, at least in the form of reviews, at some point unless they're really not particularly important. DonIago (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Doniago thanks. Unless I find any meaningful reviews I'll leave it as it is. Should I summarize our conversation in Talk:Around the World in Eighty Days or is there no point at the moment? DGtal (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't really feel there's any need to do that. If you'd like the opinion of additional editors though, you're welcome to do so. DonIago (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Doniago thanks. Unless I find any meaningful reviews I'll leave it as it is. Should I summarize our conversation in Talk:Around the World in Eighty Days or is there no point at the moment? DGtal (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- From how you're describing it, it still sounds as though some secondary source somewhere should have found it significant enough to talk about at some point, though? I'm not expecting an entire essay about it or such, but musicals do get talked about, at least in the form of reviews, at some point unless they're really not particularly important. DonIago (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's not significant as in something I would discuss in a theatre course or write a paper about. I is significant in the sense of a musical that was seen live by tens of thousands and later by many more on TV, video and streaming and having the soundtrack heard years later on music apps. DGtal (talk) 07:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- If it's that significant then it would seem to follow that there should be seconary sources that have discussed it, yes? DonIago (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's a Hanukka show - around this Jewish holiday there is a multitude of shows in Israelfor kids, mostly unrelated to the actual holiday that run sometimes dozens of times in a couple of weeks, then vanish till next year (the Festigal has been doing it for 40 years). This show has been successful enough to be in stage multiple years (just found a 2021 production reference) so I think is is notable. DGtal (talk) 08:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- If no secondary sources have discussed the show (i.e. reviews or otherwise a decent discussion of it), then I would argue that it's not significant enough for inclusion. DonIago (talk) 08:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hamastan
editThis word did not originate in Arabic, but originated in Hebrew, and entered Arabic from Hebrew (or from English from Hebrew). Anything that gives the idea that it's a native Arabic word will be a sensitive issue with some... AnonMoos (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The word is a neologism with zero real Hebrew in it. If you look in the Hebrew text the claim is that it was probably invented in Israel in 2004 but by 2005 was proudly used by Mahmoud al-Zahar (link), so I think the Arab context is fresh enough to warrant use. DGtal (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Category:Libraries by year of establishment
editA category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Category:Libraries by year of establishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, please explain at the linked discussion page what you currently suggest we do. DGtal (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)