Reporting of a suspicious sockpuppet

Hello Bbb23, I am quite suspicious of the newly created anonymous user with the name of "2001:44C8:4244:C52E:1:1:561A:1C66" their spammable edits seem similar to the user "Teddy983" and "BlueDIAMOND20s" (both Teddy983 and BlueDIAMOND20s are suspicious of being the same account which is sockpuppeting), I suggest taking a review in it. Thank you. Sincerely, Khant KhantWiki (talk) 11:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree, I've blocked them for 72 hours. Thanks for letting me know.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Appes900 and Pandemonium91871 may also be sockpuppets of BlueDIAMOND20s/BlueDiamond.d/Rulergood/Teddy983. Khiikiat (talk) 18:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I blocked and tagged Pandemonium91871. I don't think Appes900 is a sock of BlueDIAMOND20s for a couple of reasons: (1) they edit from a different technical platform (the socks are very consistent with a particular platform) and (2) at least some of Appes900's edits are reverting the socks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bbboy990 (talk · contribs) is probably another sock. Khiikiat (talk) 08:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yup, blocked and tagged, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion

95.168.116.29, who you blocked earlier, is now using 95.168.107.28. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I've blocked the new one, but, honestly, I'm not quite sure what's going on. At first I thought it was Trimpops editing logged out, but after translating the conversation between the IPs and Trimpops on Trimpops' Talk page, I'm uncertain, but there must be some relationship between them. And I really don't like the IPs editing in project space. I've posted to Trimpops Talk page; we'll see how they respond.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Appeal follow-up

Given that they seem willing to learn and the draft in question is has now been accepted, improved and moved to main space, are you ok with a tentative unblock of Gcwcd?-- Ponyobons mots 18:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

There's also Tbrennan0827. There's a lot to wade through, but they've agreed to not create any further articles and to abide by WP:MOS, and would like to edit articles on endangered Sámi language. Seems WP:GAB-y enough to extend some rope? Maybe?-- Ponyobons mots 19:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm too tired to give this the attention it merits. I was tired before lunch, but a big lunch has almost put me to sleep. Certainly makes me laaaazzzy. If you don't mind waiting, I'll try to review the two cases by no later than September 1. If you think it shouldn't wait, do whatever you think best.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
That must have been one hell of a lunch if it won't be digested until September 1st ;). I'm trying to clear out some of the older requests sitting at CAT:RFU and it's been a slog. I think that there are quite a few that were correctly rejected early on, but when an actual GAB-compliant appeal is made, usually after several tries, most of the regulars reviewing the log have already declined a previous appeal so they won't act on it. It's certainly easier to reject an appeal than to grant one, unfortunately. I only brought two of the ones that I think have a chance of making a second chance work. Plus I never want to miss the opportunity to play Mutt and Jeff with you. -- Ponyobons mots 22:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I plan on lots of big lunches between now and September 1.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Lob a tasty dish or two in my general direction then.-- Ponyobons mots 23:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply