User talk:Athaenara/Archive 9

Learn more about this page

This is an archive of discussions from 2011.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, do so on the current talk page.

← Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 →

Conflict of interest discussions in 2011

Rockcorps

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

→ in re: Rockcorps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
→ see also: Wikipedia:Requested articles/music#Organizations, Wikipedia:Requested articles/Culture and fine arts#Media Networks and Organizations, Katrockcorps (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Twiggie nyc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Joydoss (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Please Restore RockCorps Deleted Page

Good afternoon,

I am contacting you on behalf of RockCorps LLC, today as I was about to navigate through our Wikipedia page I noticed that you had deleted our page for the reason of being "ambiguous self promotion". Our page contained simply biographical information with a list of our concerts we have held and the artists we have worked with. I ask you to please restore our page which is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockcorps.

Israel Nery —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.63.195.46 (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The term is "unambiguous advertising or promotion" (see Wikipedia:Spam). Whether you were editing as Katrockcorps, Twiggie nyc, Joydoss, or all of the above, please refresh your memory of the {{uw-coi}} warnings on User talk:Katrockcorps and User talk:Joydoss before considering Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 04:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Athaenara,

I am afraid that was my fault. I had not realised that as a rockcorps employee I was not able to edit the page and did not understand until the article was deleted. I have put the article down as a request for an independant editor on the requests page and declared my position. Is there anyway that the original article can be restored? The one before I started editing it in december?

Thank you very much for your help. Kat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katrockcorps (talk • contribs) 12:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

There was no non-spam version in the page history. – Athaenara ✉ 01:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Athaenara,

Oh, ok. But how come there was an article published before I made adjustments? Is it not possible to go back to that then? Is the best way just to put in the request as I have done and hope that an independent editor deems it worthy of an article?

Thank you very much for your assistance, I really appreciate your advice. - Kat —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.121.129 (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Alpha Pup Records

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara, can you help me please?

Hi Athaenara,

My name is Shilo Urban and I was wondering if you might be able to help me regarding a page that I created, which you deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Pup_Records&action=edit&redlink=1

Alpha Pup is a fully legit record label operating out of LA that has been mentioned numerous times on the BBC and NPR.

Truly I created this page so long ago that I can't quite remember - but I think it was just a shell, more of a place-holder than anything else. OR it is also possible that I wrote the post with too much "promo speak" and failed to use the appropriate objective tone.

In either case, I would like to try again. Wikipedia definitely needs an Alpha Pup Records page! What can I do to help rectify the situation?

Thank you,

Shilo Urban aka shilonikelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shilonikelle (talk • contribs) 01:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your article consisted of five highly promotional paragraphs (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline), which was why it was deleted per {{db-g11}} as unambiguous advertising. Please review the conflict of interest warnings on your own talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 03:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Brandbull

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara, Your Tip of Today reads "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers" and you have deleted my page without pointing out the exact corrections that could make the User Page better. May I know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandbull (talk • contribs) 05:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I thought the advice posted by other editors on your user talk page was sufficient. Per your question above, I added a {{uw-coi}} message as well. – Athaenara ✉ 06:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Robert S. Shoemaker & Associates

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Message

Hi Athaenara, we received your message after our attempt to revise our post [[1]]. I originally had a consultant help make a post from information we provided - after several suggestions from people and companies that we provide information about our company on Wikipedia. I am currently working outside of the USA in South America and many people are looking for information about our company, even though we have a website. We thought that this was the purpose for Wikipedia - to provide information for people and Wikipedia seems to be the location that people are looking now. Please let us know if this is not a correct assumption of the purpose, or what we need to revise. We patterned our design after several other similar articles stating similar information [[2]], [[3]] and others as shown on [[4]]. If our company information is not allowed, I think that some editor from Wikipedia needs to review the many other articles currently online for similar criteria. Thank you for assistance and understanding as I have assumed this project after receiving the proof from our consultant, that we subsequently pasted into the website. He suggested this process so that we may watch / monitor revisions that are made in the future for protection because we have heard of many stories how other competitors are sabotaging websites in Wikipedia. (rss 00:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rssatl (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free listing service. Please read the {{uw-coi}} warning on your user talk page (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion for more). – Athaenara ✉ 00:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Faith2Share

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Deletion of page

Please could you explain why you decided to delete my article about "Faith2Share". This was a serious academic attempt to update Wiki content on Christian mission which is getting quite dated. If you check for "Faith2Share" on Wiki generally you will find quite a few references to this new networking phenomenon and so I thought some history of this particular network was needed. The article I wrote included a lot of cross-referencing to established Christian mission organisations. It was not designed to 'promote' Faith2Share (which in fact does not, as far as I know, seek prototion as it is a closed network) but was informational. If you would like to suggest a rewrite I am happy to attempt this if you could kindly send me my orignial text. I have other contributions to make in this academic area of study - Christian mission - but am hesitant to spend time on this if you will simply delete them. I look forward to receiving your advice here or email me at markoxbrow@aol.com Mark. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.161.215 (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

On my bulletin board above you'll find the category of admins who will provide copies of deleted articles. I posted a {{uw-coi}} warning on User talk:Markoxbrow to help you understand your predicament vis-à-vis Wikipedia's position on conflict of interest editing. – Athaenara ✉ 22:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You deleted this as G11; the author has asked at WP:REFUND for it to be restored. Looking at the deleted article, I am inclined to agree with him that it is not blatantly promotional, though I have doubts about notability. Would you object to userfying it for him to see if he can improve the references? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oxbrow (identified variously as "International Coordinator" and "International Director" of Faith2Share) has a conflict of interest which he neglected to mention in his undeletion request. I wouldn't userfy it but I won't try to stop anyone else from doing so. – Athaenara ✉ 03:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

This Century Band

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Athaenara, you deleted the article about the band 'This Century'. They are a national touring band signed to Creative Artists Agency and are also on a major label, 'Warner Bros. Records'. I believe the article was formatted rather incorrectly from the beginning and lacked appropriate references. I an working on behalf of their management firm and am going to recreate the page and include the appropriate links and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theaddicts (talk • contribs) 04:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I posted a {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page to help you understand your position working on behalf of their management firm here. – Athaenara ✉ 04:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chris Daniel

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of Biography

You nominated for deletion a biography page for the new Harris County District Clerk that mirrors almost identically several other existing pages (See Pat Lykos). Why? Could you not have edited instead of deleting wholesale? Was your deletion political? FYI, Harris County is the 3rd largest county in the US and the Largest in TX and deserves recognition of its county-wide elected officials — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harris DC (talk • contribs) 04:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Another editor tagged it as spam; it was deleted as such per {{db-g11}}. See Wikipedia:Spam for more guidance on that. – Athaenara ✉ 05:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

AnaJet

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to request pages about Direct to Garment Printing. It is a very important industry, much like screen printing. MantisMB (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your AnaJet article was deleted per {{db-g11}} as spam (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline). I posted a conflict of interest warning on your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 22:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interactive Marketing Research Organization

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Athaenara. You have new messages at talk:Interactive Marketing Research Organization.
Message added 04:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

G11 contested Phearson (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

St. Joseph Media

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Canadian Family (magazine) and Weddingbells (magazine)

Hi There,

I created Wikipedia pages for Weddingbells (magazine) and Canadian Family (magazine) which were deleted. The reason stated was they were considered 'promotion' and a 'conflict of interest' existed. I included only basic information such as distribution, awards won and an brief editorial overview. I do work for the publisher - so how would I go about creating such a page and making that relationship clear? Should I remove external links or specific content? Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

These are the links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weddingbells_(magazine) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Family_(magazine)

Veronicaobrien (talk) 18:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)VeronicaobrienReply

As the "Marketing and Promotions Associate for St. Joseph Media" (the publisher), you need to read and understand the Wikipedia:Spam guideline and the {{uw-coi}} warnings which were posted on your own talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 01:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

INGfertility and Darb8033

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: INGfertility (talk · contribs) aka Darb8033 (talk · contribs) and User talk:7/Archive 3#Sock puppet Note
→ see also: User talk:7/Archive 2#User INGfertility and User talk:Athaenara/Archive 8#Pre-seed (Pre-Seed)

Courtesy Note

Hi Athaenara - just a quick fyi that there's a discussion which may involve you here. Thanks. 7 22:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note. – Athaenara ✉ 23:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paperless Warehousing

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

FYI conflict of interest guideline - Paperless Warehousing

Hi,

I created the Paperless Warehousing page with the help of a consultant and have received your message. Could you please tell me where I go to find the page and edit so it meets the conflict of interest guidelines and neutral view point.

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclinch (talk • contribs) 23:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your text, culminating in Please visit our web site - Paperless Warehousing, was highly promotional. Admins who will provide copies of deleted articles are in the category linked on my bulletin board above. If you don't understand the policies and guidelines linked in the {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page, re-read Wikipedia:Spam. – Athaenara ✉ 00:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Athaenara,

I have contacted one of the Admins (HJ Mitchell) but I seem to be going around in cycles. Could you please advise me where I can get a copy of the article so I can have it modified in accordance with the relevant policies.

thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclinch (talk • contribs) 01:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

In the context of Wikipedia, which is an online encyclopedia, not a free listing or advertising service (see Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion), you are a spammer: a single-purpose account with a conflict of interest, known in Wikipedia shorthand as a coi spa. If your company is sufficiently notable as confirmed by independent reliable sources, editors who don't have your promotional intent may write an article about it. – Athaenara ✉ 01:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

VRL Financial News

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re:

The Accountant (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
International Accounting Bulletin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Leasing Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Motor Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Private Banker International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Retail Banker International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

→ see also:

Webvrl2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Mitchgurl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Deletion of pages -

Hi Athaenara - I am representing VRL Financial News. We publish 12 different magazines in financial sector. Our intern Lauren had created pages in Wikipedia for all these magazines, giving general information about the magazines, but many of them were deleted. The deletion log says that the contents were ambiguous and promotional. I would like to make changes to them so that they adhere to the guidelines set by Wikipedia. Could you please help me understand the modification required in these pages. Look forward to hearing from you. Webvrl (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Thank you - Gayatri GadreReply

Unambiguous advertising or promotion is commonly specified in {{db-g11}} deletion summaries. For more information, see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline as well as the pages linked in the {{uw-coi}} warning on your own talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 04:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

==Hi A, Thanks for your response. Would you be kind enough to make these pages available for me to edit please. After editing them, I will request a review by administrators and once they are as per the guidelines, I will make them live. Please let me know if this is possible, or if there is other way to get the contents approved before putting them live (as the pages with those names are already deleted, and help manual suggests not to recreate them, or it may cause your id to be blocked. Webvrl (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)GayatriReply

==Hi A, Thanks for the pointers. I went through all the FAQ and guidelies for 'conflict of interest'. Could you please make those pages available to me for editing them. ~~Gayatri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webvrl (talk • contribs) 10:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

== Hi A, Just to clarify, could you please make all of the deleted pages available for me to edit -

Leasing Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Motor Finance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Private Banker International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Retail Banker International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Thanks for your help. Gayatri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webvrl (talk • contribs) 12:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Born On Original Motives

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there,

I represent BOOM (Born On Original Motives). I created a Wiki page yesterday and it has already been deleted. I am not trying to promote my brand, just trying to explain who we are. Is it possible to keep this wiki entry open while I add to it? Any tips to keep it live and not have it appear as a promotion? Any help is greatly appreciated as I am not Wiki savvy. Thanks!!

Justin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwitt010 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:KuwarOnline/Taj

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there, Just wondering why you deleted page which is in my personal user space? I m waiting to fix issues which the article has. Once done I will restore it to main space. Please restore it back. Thanks KuwarOnline ^Talk 05:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

It showed up in Database reports/Broken redirects because it redirected to Taj Pharmaceuticals Limited, one of many similar pages which were deleted per {{db-g11}} as spam. – Athaenara ✉ 12:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for restoring, I know it has been deleted many times mostly because of notability/credible sources not found. Which I suppose to fix it. KuwarOnline ^Talk 04:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gianfranco Chiarini

Latest comment: 13 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

UserBevwb1220

Please find corrections to the Gianfranco Chiarini Wiki Article, which has been revised several times. Thanks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianfranco_Chiarini — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bevwb1220 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

UserBevwb1220

Hello, Athaenara. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.224.154 (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gianfranco Chiarini

Hi Athaenara the Gianfranco Chiarni page has been re-written to Wikipedia standards, can you please review so that we can take the advert down? Thanks! Beverly Wehmer Johnson (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's still quite promotional and appears to be one of the products at two single-purpose accounts, yours and Andrea D'Angelico (talk · contribs), across multiple wikipedias. You can open a discussion on the article talk page prior to posting on the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard or ask for assistance on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 20:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Athaenara per Wiki adminstration I was given info that our article was in the context of an advertisement. Therefore I changed, and restructured sentences to meet with Wikipedia guideline. Regarding Andrea D'Angelico, I am not certain what has been translated from the English version but will confer with him as for the aforementioned. Please give specifics as to what needs to be corrected to meet encyclopedic standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.225.147 (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gianfranco Chiarini

We have been in direct contact with Wikipedia Adminstration, and they have been assisting us with Common Usage of Photos and determining correct verbiage to use in the Gianfranco Chiarini articles. However, you have not assisted us with what needs to be changed per sentence guidelines or structure in order to meet the Wikipedia guidelines. We have followed the guidelines as per the Wikipedia Administrative, and would like very much if you would assist with neutrality of the subject at hand. Furthermore, quoting Wikipedia guidelines is not helping us to achieve our goal of a flawlessly written article. Please assist with providing direction in composing a non-biased article.

Thanks! Beverly Wehmer Johnson (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC) 71.48.225.147 (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Any one or all of you may ask for assistance on the article talk page and the NPOV and COI noticeboards (linked above in my previous reply) as I previously suggested. Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests is another appropriate venue. – Athaenara ✉ 21:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Per your previous discussion, I've added the discussion to the Gianfranco Chiarini talk page. I will also add the the NPOV, and COI as you've requested.

Thanks! Beverly Wehmer Johnson (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Intergen

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete page "Intergen"

I requested the speedy deletion for "Intergen". Thank you for responding so promptly! Upon digging further, this company does appear to be notable and they should be given a chance to re-write their article.

Will you please reinstate the page? I will then change the AFD template to {{advert}} to give them some time.

Missouri Boys State

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deleted Missouri Boys State

I'm trying to contribute to Wikipedia by adding an organization of which I have knowledge of, but also a volunteer for. What beter way to get information on the organization? I was in the middle of adapting the information to conform with your policies but then you just deleted it. I read through your conlfict of interest page link. Can you please undelete this page so I can edit it and then resubmit for administrator approvial? Thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanhendrickson (talk • contribs) 22:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

NIRMAN

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Deletion of the page NIRMAN

Dear Athanara, My self Dr. Abhijeet. I am learning Wikipedia. I dont know how to use it correctly. I would like to know as why the article of nirman was deleted? Nirman is an organisation of the youths of the maharashtra.

Here is the website http://nirman.mkcl.org/

- Dr. Abhijeet Safai abhijeet.safai@gmail.com

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.68.122.163 (talk) 06:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Athaenara, My self Dr. Abhijeet. I am learning Wikipedia. I dont know how to use it correctly. I would like to know as why the article of nirman was deleted? Nirman is an organisation of the youths of the maharashtra.

Here is the website http://nirman.mkcl.org/

- Dr. Abhijeet Safai abhijeet.safai@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs) 06:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your page was deleted per {{db-g11}} as unambiguous advertising or promotion, which it was. Please see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline for more information. – Athaenara ✉ 18:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ok i will read it and will write you later. Thanks Abhijeet Safai 02:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

I have read the Wikipedia:Spam. I still believe that the article is about the fact about the Nirman. (It is a group of inspired youths who are working for social change. There are some good works done by them which have been documented by newspapers and can be referenced.). As i am learning, there is possibility that i wrote the article in wrong fashion. I would like to learn the correct way to write it. I definitely know that my intention is not to promote or advertise a group but to record the facts. Please guide. Thanks Abhijeet Safai 03:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

I posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page to aid you in this. – Athaenara ✉ 05:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes Thanks. Can I talk there? Or this is the place where should i communicate with you. Thanks. Abhijeet Safai 05:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

Try the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 06:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ok Abhijeet Safai 10:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

Actually i had signed the post, then why is it showing that "unsigned" ? Abhijeet Safai 05:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

Noor Photo Agency

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of Noor photo agency

Hi,

Last night you deleted Noor photo agency page on wikipedia. I was wondering if you could tell me how to restore the deleted page as it was deleted under 'unambiguous advertising' The said page was not finished and although it was not advertising (the other leading photojournalism agencies Magnum Photos and VII Photos are also on wikipedia) i can understand how you might have mistaken it. The agency is also a foundation that is a non profit organisation which was what i wanted to write about. I hope to hear from you soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.113.2.204 (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The deleted page was a spam vanity article largely copied from http://www.noorimages.com/agency and http://consequencesbynoor.com/, as Rrburke noted when tagging it. See the Wikipedia:Spam guideline and the {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page for more. – Athaenara ✉ 18:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

International Pyrotechnics Society

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wuhwuzdat is dedicated to Speedy Deletion, could you help please?

I feel like Wuhwuzdat is dedicated to my Speedy Deletion, could you help please? I am working "hard" within my personal draft space to help write an entry for a non-profit society. Wuhwuzdat I think strongly believes that my page should be deleted. Do you agree? What should I do to save a draft, and improve the quality so it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion? I'd like to have a few people who are higher ranked Wiki Editors, preferably people with a technical background, like engineering to look at it. I need some help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiPyroEngineer (talk • contribs) 07:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jonasorg

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: Jonasorg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi, When I put a comment in English and Filipino on their talk page this morning, there were two templates. One, I believe, was a request to delete the talk page, the other to delete the article page under G7. They seem to have understood so much, but their English is either totally non existent or at the least, extremely limited. Perhaps you could take another look and maybe together we can figure out what he really wants to do. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

As far as I can tell, he wanted his user account deleted because it was all a big mistake (a series of big mistakes) and he wanted the school article deleted because he and his friends think it's nonsense, empty, non-descriptive, dumb, and embarassing to the school, although the reversion of his edits there left what experienced editors consider a reasonable stub. Language difficulties notwithstanding, he may have understood your most recent message there. – Athaenara ✉ 22:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kamco

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in: {KAMCO} (Keane Australia Micropayment Consortium) Date: 7 March 2011
Hi Athaenara, Thank you for editing this page however I am at a loss why all the content was removed. Under the heading "Controversy in Victoria", you have removed referenced content that is pertinent to Kamco. Kamco is now a house-hold name in Victoria and would appear in national newspapers on at least a monthly basis. Can you please review your edits and help me understand the reasons please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.27.69 (talk) 12:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The reliability and neutrality of the content took an abrupt downturn when Johanna Waldon (talk · contribs) (the "Communications Advisor at Kamco" according to info available online) began editing the article two months ago, so restoring the version prior to that made sense to me, but per your message now above, I reverted that edit. – Athaenara ✉ 21:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

International Association of Project Managers

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara, with regret we learned about the decision to delete our page. So we would be very eager to learn what went wrong and how we could improve. First, the stated reason seems not to be justified, as far as we see it.

IAPM is an international non-profit organization that promotes the art of project management. This is done by the contribution of specialists and scientists, who do not receive any compensation for their contributions. We certainly feel that our wikipedia entry is not simple advertising, but rather an encyclopedic article about an international association. What do we need to do from you standpoint and how can we stay on wikipedia?

Your response and opinion is greatly appreciated, regards, Hans

hansunhooked@yahoo.com

Hansunhooked (talk) 15:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

If the {{uw-coi}} information posted on your talk page wasn't sufficient, you may want to ask for clarification on the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 22:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tree shaping

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: WP:ANI Archive 681#Proposed Topic Ban for Blackash and Slowart on Tree shaping related articles
→ See also:

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tree shaping
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 48#On tree shaping article an COI editor is trying censor content
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 40#Tree shaping - User:Blackash
Blackash (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Slowart (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Tree shaping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There is a proposed Topic Ban for Blackash and Slowart on Tree shaping related articles at the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents As you have had some involvement with these editors in question, you may wish to comment. Blackash have a chat 00:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have a vague memory of having once offered a third opinion on a page where you two were disputing a year or two ago, perhaps you can refresh my memory. – Athaenara ✉ 01:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Buchanan (band)

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Deletion of Buchanan_(band)

Hi Athaenara, I understand that initially the Buchanan_(band) page was, despite being backed up by multiple sources after most sentences, too descriptive and not factual enough. However there was a revision prior to deletion that removed it from being promotional and purely factual. In this latest 'factual' entry, we managed to check off two of the requirements of this document http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) In the document it asks that you don't write an article unless you have at least one of the following. In our article not only was their references from magazines, triple j databases and some of the world's busiest blogs, we also provided proof of being in high rotation in Australia, which is number 11 on the list.

Please reconsider or at the very least, let a rewrite occur without an automatic deletion. At the very least, the point was NOT to add spam or too many links - just to show evidence making it worthy of an article.

Regards, Josh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh simo (talk • contribs) 23:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're trying to promote your band on Wikipedia. If it is truly as notable as you claim it is, editors who don't have your conflict of interest will undoubtedly create a neutral and well-referenced article about it. Please read and comprehend the {{uw-coi}} on your talk page: if your only interest in this encyclopedia is self-promotion, it would be better not to edit here. – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Then let those unbiased editors come in and remove the apparent conflict of interest, rather than delete it. Its final iteration was completely unbiased. It was edited by a neutral party and trimmed any 'COI' leaving only fact which meets all the requirements of a wikipedia page. I am happy to leave it at this, but if a fan or a third party start the page again and it is purely factual, I fail to understand the motive in deleting it. Furthermore I have put in a request on the requests page to have it written by an editor and have created a special page on my profile as a guide for that editor. Please do not delete that guide as it complies with all Wikipedia policies. Regards. - Josh simo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC).Reply

Talk page stalker

Sorry to butt in here, but I happened to read your comments while still on this page from my earlier discussion above. I think the concern is more about the fact that the article is itself authored by someone with a conflict of interest - in other words, the article was authored by a member of the band. There are a lot of things that establish notability. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with Australian music and thus might not be the best person to determine if some of this information is notable. While it provides good background, there is not really much that I find notable. I personally knew a guy who released a music album in 2007 or thereabouts; unfortunately, I do not think he has a Wikipedia article either even though he wrote his own music. It just didn't go anywhere being self-released. I hope it gets into the right hands because I've heard people say he's good, but he still isn't notable to have an article.

With that said, being courted to play for record labels and maybe get a contract; that's good! However, it's still not notable in and of itself to just play for the record label in a tryout, so to speak. So I agree with Athaenara, it's better if someone not associated from the band starts the article. Even putting in a request, the person who writes the article - if it happens - shouldn't really be using information you provide as again, there is a COI involved; you are trying to have information added to an article about yourself, even if it IS properly sourced. I hope that your band does succeed, and I hope in my watching the Hot 100 that one day you crack it or another acclaimed chart through Billboard (trust me, THAT is notable for an album and inherently makes the band notable), but I do agree that it's better someone else write a fresh article using information they research so there is no COI. They may decide to use something you provide, and if so, great; they are not however required to, and you technically should not contribute to the article even once it does exist from a third party. Cheers and good luck! =) CycloneGU (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

High rotation and distribution through a major distributor should count for something but alas, I request that this talkback box be deleted as I am satisfied that it is out of my control and for respect of humility for the band in this pubic space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh simo (talk) 03:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree with CycloneGU but I took another look at the timestamps and found that my deletion was almost an hour after Night Gyr had declined speedy deletion based on Alzarian16's edit more than four hours before that, so I undeleted it to restore the original edit history. It may still be subject to deletion via other processes such as prod or AfD. – Athaenara ✉ 07:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

SureSync and SoftwarePursuits

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted Commercial Listing?

Hello Athaenara,

I am contacting you because it appears you have deleted a commercial listing I posted.

Being new to Wikipedia, I'm sure I missed something in the details. However, the listing I was deleted from was specifically for Commercial Products: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_synchronization_software#Commercial

Every single product in this listing is commercial. Can you please help me out and explain why we were eliminated?

I really appreciate your assistance. We are a small company and just trying to keep up with all of the competitiors that are listed on this page.

Spursuits (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

In that mid-January edit (diff) I removed listings for two pages which had been deleted as spam. I put them back (diff) because it's possible that editors who don't have a conflict of interest such as yours will write articles about them. – Athaenara ✉ 21:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

J.B. Wing

Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

My Article Deletion

To Whom It May Concern:

I am a professional actor. I created an article for myself yesterday because I saw that my name is listed in another Wikipedia article about a Broadway Show in which I performed called, High Fidelity.

Because I am already listed on this page as an original cast member, I didn't think it was unreasonable to want to have my name linked to a Wikipedia article about me. Everything I put in the article is factual, and there are trustworthy internet sites that I listed as references to my work, such as; BroadwayWorld.com, Playbill.com, and the Internet Broadway Database.

I have also legally paid for and now own a domain name on the internet, and I included that as a reference as well. I'm not sure if this was considered inappropriate by your regulations. However, that site is a representation of my professional work, and there is nothing inappropriate on it.

Is there anyway I could make changes to my article that would fit your regulations and keep it from being deleted? If so, I would very much appreciate it. I did not mean to post anything inappropriate or self-promoting on your web-site.

I sincerely thank you for your time.

Warm regards, 162.90.144.23 (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

~~What is the article? – Athaenara ✉ 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)~~Reply

I checked your deleted contribs, figured out what you were talking about, and posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page at User talk:Jbwing to clarify the situation. – Athaenara ✉ 02:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Further Confusion about my article being deleted

Hello, Athaenara.

You have sent me some information about my article being deleted. I'm sorry, but I'm still confused. There is an article on Wikipedia about the Broadway Show, High Fidelity. I am an original cast member that's listed on THAT Wikipedia page. Since my name is listed on that page, I wanted to create an article which links to my name. As you can see, Kirsten Wyatt, who is also listed on the High Fidelity page was able to create an article for herself as an actor. I included only factual information and NO opions. I also included references. In fact, my article looks very similar to hers. So I don't understand why my article is considered inappropriate. As I am new to Wikipedia, would you mind telling me the very specific things that I need to remove from this article? What I would like to be in the article is below. Thank you.

J.B. Wing is an American actress who made her Broadway debut in the musical, High Fidelity written by Amanda Green and Pulitzer Prize winner, David Lindsay-Abaire, and composed by Pulitzer Prize winner, Tom Kitt. She also performed in the 1st Broadway National Tours of Xanadu, directed by Christopher Ashley, and Legally Blonde, directed and choreographed by Jerry Mitchell.

In 2005, J.B. performed in off-Broadway's, BINGO, and soon after that, she appeared in Bill Russell and Henry Krieger's musical, LUCKY DUCK at the Old Globe in San Diego. LUCKY DUCK was directed by Tony Award winner, John Rando.

She has studied with Michelle Pawk, Craig Carnelia, Robert X. Modica, and Marni Nixon.

Sincerely, Jbwing (talk) 22:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Restored for now, still subject to deletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Restored?

Hi, Athaenara. Why restore a spam autobiography lacking a plausible assertion of notability? -- Rrburke (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was against my better instincts to restore coi spa spam but I could see some merit in exposing it to further views by other editors. – Athaenara ✉ 02:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Athaenara. Thanks for your reply. Sorry: my message was unintentionally cryptic: there was supposed to be a link to the article so you might be able to discern, y'know, what the heck I was referring to. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem :-) I was sure what it was on sight because of the timing and I remembered that the quite pertinent csd tags were added by you. I find coi spas frankly tiresome but I try to remain civil and let them have opportunities to see that this encyclopedia's orientation against spam isn't just me being cranky about it. – Athaenara ✉ 02:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nick Taussig

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of my article

Hi, you deleted my article (Nick Taussig) under code G11 which claims the article was, or read as, an advertisement. It was in fact an article for an author and film producer. The purpose of the article was for encyclopedic information. I am happy to rewrite the article if you would like to provide me with some feedback. I felt that the tone of the article was unbiased and purely biographical. I also have additional external sources from reputable links such as Screen International which I can add. Nick Taussig is an establish author an film producer and is also the founder of a charity. These are all recognised and reputable professions. The film company he works for has an article listed; [revolver entertainment]. Please can you repost my article. Nick Taussig (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your user name suggests that you are he, hence the {{uw-autobiography}} notice from another editor on your talk page, yet you wrote of him here in the third person as if you are not. Did you read and understand the {{uw-coi}} notice which I posted on your user talk page? – Athaenara ✉ 21:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am not Nick, I thought the user name appeared at the top of the article and it would look better if it was under his name. I do work with Nick however. I apologise for this and I am happy to write the article under a different username. Nick Taussig (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, regarding the above, can you please repost my article into my userspace so I can rework it. Thank you. Nick Taussig (talk) 11:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

On Wikipedia, you are what is known as a coi spa: a single-purpose account with a conflict of interest. I will not typically give aid and comfort to such editors myself, but you can if you wish explain your situation and ask your questions at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and/or Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion (see my bulletin board above for the category of admins who provide copies of deleted pages). – Athaenara ✉ 20:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for getting back to me. I have read the deletion policy and it says that 'If an article was deleted for lacking content or for having inappropriate content (this applies to most speedy deletions) and you wish to create a better article about the same subject, you can simply go ahead and do so, with no need for review'. I am going to rewrite the article for review and try to follow the guidelines more closely. Nick Taussig (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Naszscape

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Yer why are you a noob bro

I'm trying too create a page for my server, all the links are official, and it's going to be on the RuneLocus toplist for top 10 servers, but I waste about 2 hours working on it, and then you just be a l0ser and a c()cky nub and delete my page? Lol bro ur sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PvM Nasz (talk • contribs) 22:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

NWAV 40

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara - I have a question regarding the NWAV 40 page you deleted recently. I would still like to create a page about the conference, so I would really appreciate it if you could tell me specifically which part of the article was not appropriate. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skjcon437 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If the {{uw-coi}} posted on your talk page wasn't sufficient, you may post a request for clarification on the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 05:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll check it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skjcon437 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

National Society of High School Scholars

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of NSHSS

Dear Athaenara,

It has come to our attention that the NSHSS Wiki page was deleted in early April by the user listed as Athaenara. Myself along with my colleagues who are employees of NSHSS were wondering why the page was deleted and if there was any way to restore it. Any information you can provide is extremely helpful.

Many thanks, Adelinebarnes

Adelinebarnes (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article was deleted by Postdlf as per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Society of High School Scholars two weeks ago. NSHSS, which I deleted a day later (page log), had been a redirect to it. I posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 23:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Michigan Schools and Government Credit Union

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Athaenara,

I have already requested that the Michigan Schools and Government Credit Union Code be preovided to me, but can you let me know which parts did not fit the guidelines? It was based on many existing credit union pages. I sent you an e-mail as well.

Thanks and have a great evening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSGCU (talk • contribs) 22:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was wholly spam (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline) and deleted as such per {{db-g11}}. For further information, see the {{uw-coi}} on your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 23:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mark Scharenbroich

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of Mark Scharenbroich (biography of living person) page

Dear Athaenara:

We created a Biography of Living Person page yesterday for the user MarkScharenbroich (Mark Scharenbroich), who is an American author, humorist and motivational speaker. You chose to delete it. We took steps to create what we thought was a neutral point of view page -- similar in vein to the Wikipedia page for public speaker/figure Tony Robbins. Can you offer more explanation as to why Mark's page was wholeheartedly deleted and not simply edited?

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkScharenbroich (talk • contribs) 14:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC) MarkScharenbroich (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The informative messages posted on your user talk page seem quite comprehensive to me. I added a {{uw-coi}} to them to further aid your understanding. – Athaenara ✉ 18:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fryslan Webservices Survey Project

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Userpage deletion

To those responsible for deleting user pages.

Can anyone please explain why contrary to the general Wikipedia advise and instructions to make use of user pages as a start up and experimental place to create and try out pages certain people start deleting those pages immediately. One can expect this on official articles, not on user page tryouts. Advise and comments would be welcome of course.

Please add your comments. Meanwhile it would be highly appreciated to get the deleted work back to it's original state.

Fwsmaster (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)FwsmasterReply

I hope the {{uw-coi}} I posted to your talk page was helpful. – Athaenara ✉ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Asana Journal

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you please explain why the article was deleter? It is not intended to promote the international magazine which is distributed free of charge. It is not dissimilar to Yoga Journal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbdsgn (talk • contribs) 08:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Zell65 tagged it for speedy deletion for the following reasons:

because it does nothing but promote some entity, person or product and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion... See CSD G11.
as an article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. See CSD A7.

If you wish to pursue this further after reading the {{uw-coi}} warnings on User talk:Asana-journal, you may wish to post on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 18:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Harmon Leo=

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Harmon Leon WP REFUNDed

Just a courtesy note that I restored Harmon Leon today after a request at WP:REFUND. You had deleted it as an expired prod. The request for undeletion effectively challenged the prod, so I restored the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

J2K-Codec

Latest comment: 13 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

I am not sure if this is how I am supposed to talk to you, correct me if I am wrong.

You have deleted my article about my product J2K-Codec. I understand that I might have a conflict of interest, that's why I filled in only basic information in the article, there was absolutely no advertisiment or anything. Any person could have created it! It was neutral. Similar pages exist for other products, like Kakadu with even more text! So why did you delete it? Alex saveliev (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not for self-promotion. If you wish to pursue this in spite of the {{uw-coi}} on your talk page, you may post on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 20:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Note that your article cited only your website as a source, while the Kakadu (software) article has citations of three independent sources. – Athaenara ✉ 21:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kakadu has citations for facts in has in the article. My article was just a stub to give a chance to anyone to contribute later. It had no facts yet, hence, no external citations. And the article itself was absolutely neutral - I don't see how the phrase "J2K-Codec is a library for decoding JPEG2000" can be any more neutral. Anyone else could have created it, what difference does it make that I am the author? You can post it under your username if you want, I don't care. I just expect an equal treatment with the other products, listed on the JPEG2000 page. And I am surprised that instead of trying to fix any possible problems you just deleted the article. No offense, but it's like a doctor who prescribes decapitation for a headache.

So I want to proceed with the request for undeletion. Alex saveliev (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

BTW, this is a quote from deletion reasons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#General

"Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. "

So G11 is a wrong reason for deletion - there was no advertisiment in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex saveliev (talk • contribs) 21:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's back for now, but per the Wikipedia:Notability guideline it still needs citations of independent reliable sources. – Athaenara ✉ 00:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Give me some time to provide independent references. I also have one question - can I cite my own site for the date of release? It's on my history page. - Alex saveliev (talk) 07:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

For example, OpenJPEG uses a reference to its own news page to reference the release date. - Alex saveliev (talk) 07:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why not. – Athaenara ✉ 07:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dante (comedian)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

zombie article

so-called because it will not stay dead, is back. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Filter Foundry

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Filter Platforms Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Filter Platforms Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Patrick Bradley (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zentropy Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The "Filter Foundry" page i created was deleted and I am going to post a new page under the same title but with different wording so it doesn't read as an advertisement:

About

FilterFoundry.com is a Business-Social Marketplace Platform for professional creative talent worldwide, allowing the community to showcase, collaborate, educate, and hire.

Creative Fields

The creative career fields of choice for the Filter Foundry community include: advertising, interactive design, film, gaming, television, animation, 3D, web, print, architecture, CAD/engineering, fine arts, photography, and traditional art. The Platform allows a creative person to update their portfolios, market their talents, get paid work, answer vital questions, learn techniques, hire talent, buy discounted digital products-- all with a customized experience specific to each individual.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkrockr10 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

It looks like advertising to me (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline). What's your connection to the company? – Athaenara ✉ 19:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

could i get a peer review?

i wanted to run this by you before i post again. you deleted the previous one so I want to make sure this is wiki worthy

Also, I'm wondering why it won't acknowledge all the text I've put in below, Mission statement through references are all absent from the preview. Thanks in advance for the help:

[article test redacted]

Funkrockr10 (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I removed the long text which you added in this edit because other users' talk pages are not for test-editing your articles. The usual way to do that is on a subpage of your own userspace such as User:Funkrockr10/sandbox. – Athaenara ✉ 08:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Filter Foundry (2)

→ in re: User:Funkrockr10/Filter Foundry
→ see also: Beta334 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Article Help

Could you review the submission on my user talk page under title, “Filter Foundry”? The article has been deleted a couple times already—I just read the anecdote about Zeo, the new creator who gets it very, very wrong (Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles/Creating a New Article), exactly my story…word for word. Trying not to make the same mistake again.

Feedback would great! I want to know if the article could now be published

Thanks a lot!

Funkrockr10 (talk) 20:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

440 Banquets & Restaurant Ahmedabad

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Eimtiyazali

Hi! I am hotelist from Gujarat, India. I thought to start a Topic related to Hotels in Gujarat & Ahmedabad, and also developing by adding some very good information about hotels here, but unfortunateley when i was trying to start a topic related Hotels in Ahmedabad & Gujarat, also added one or two hotel and restaurant like 440 Banquets & Restautant, Courtyad by merriott ahmedabad to the catagories you have deleted those articles by saying G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. please refer to the articles, those are not advertisements. And if Wikipedia is not intrested about topic on Gujarat & Ahmedabad a well known places of India and you people are just intrested in deleting such topics then just stop India Project by adding information about India.--Eimtiyaz (talk) 07:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I searched through your deleted contribs for some time before finding the page I deleted.

440 Banquets & Restaurant deleted three times, now protected from re-creation (log)
440 Restaurant deleted twice, now protected from re-creation (log)
440 restaurant deleted twice, now protected from re-creation (log)
Courtyard by Marriott Ahmedabad deleted once (log)
440 Restaurant & Banquets deleted once (log)
440 Banquets & Restaurant Ahmedabad deleted once [by me!] (log)

I referenced Wikipedia is not a soapbox in my deletion summary because it was clear from the extremely promotional text (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline) that the author(s) of the page needed to read and understand it. (As well, you may not realize it, but using so much bold markup for emphasis makes your message more difficult to read.) – Athaenara ✉ 07:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh!! I am sorry then. But i didnt mean to do that. Actually Here in Ahmedabad i am hotelist & member of Hotel Association and also food loving personality. i am having a list of welknown Hotels & Restaurants in Ahmedabad, thats why i have started a Catagory for Hotels In Ahmedabad & Hotels In Gujarat. But i was not trying to do any promotional activity i have just started adding from very first of my list but unfortunately at first only i'm stuckup. But according to me These articles and catagories are very necessary, because gujarat is an Industrial Hub of India and also the grwoth machine, you just refer WIKI articles about Gujarat and Ahmedabad you will come to know. I am requesting you to retore those catogaries and articles also, so that i can clean those article and make it correct with no promotional activities.-Eimtiyaz (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.101.254 (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

As you may realize, your registered account has been blocked for spamming (log). You may engage in the Requests for undeletion process, and/or seek further input at the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 22:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Diversified Global Graphics Group deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I did not receive notification of the proposed deletion of the page. I do not monitor the page so I missed the 7-day window. I refute the claim that this company is not notable. It was publicly owned, it has won several awards including one from the EPA, and it is international. How is it not notable? Backburnercomics (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I restored it per your protest and added an {{advert}} tag because of its highly promotional tone. – Athaenara ✉ 20:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I did not intend a promotional tone. I tried modelling as much as I could on Automatic Data Processing Inc. and RR Donnelly. I would appreciate any help on making it more compliant. Backburnercomics (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fenway Civic Association

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you take a look at the above article and tell me what needs to be done. maucho eagle _(c) 19:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It looks like clear coi spa spam to me. Topgrain said "we own the copyright" which kind of goes to yeah, we own it, so let us spam it... (here's one way I deal with that). Alternatively, the thing could be notable and you and/or other editors may want to totally rewrite it with the neutral point of view and suitable citations it must have. – Athaenara ✉ 20:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

CustomerXPs Software

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

My Article " CustomerXPS Software" has been deleted

Jitheshcxps (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Hi Athaenara, I am a part of CustomerXPs(www.customerxps.com), a startup based out of Bangalore. I found that my article " CustomerXPs Software" has been deleted from Wikipedia on 26th April, 16:31(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CustomerXPs_Software). And the deletion log says G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion as the reason for this speedy deletion.I wanted to put up an informational note on CustomerXPs software. Since we are a private company and a small one at that, we are trying to get credible visibility via channels like Wikipedia especially from a recruitment perspective since we're hiring quite aggressively this year. It would be great if you could let me know particularly which content you regarded as promotional and I will change it suitably. We have not included product information specifically so as to avoid promotion, however, since the page was flagged, I'd love your help in understanding how we can alleviate this situation at the earliest. Looking forward to your guidance,Reply

Thanks, Jithesh Rajendran, CustomerXPs Software Private Limited, Bangalore http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jithesh-rajendran/14/906/960 Follow us on @cxps Jitheshcxps (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paul Wilbur

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Please let me know where the discussion was for the proposed (and now carried out) deletion of the Paul Wilbur article. I wasn't aware that it was being considered for deletion. Thank you. Harvester^talk 14:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

When a page is tagged with a substed and dated {{proposed deletion}} template, deletion does not actually occur until seven or more days after the page was tagged, as per the three steps outlined in the introductory section of the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion policy.

"Does not meet standard of notability for musicians" was Burkina Faso's reason when adding the template at 07:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC). TonyTheTiger further supported this on the article's talk page at 13:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC): "This article fails WP:MUSICBIO. Notability must be established according to policy guidelines."Reply

I reviewed it one week later. As there were no sources at all, only a link to wilburministries.com in the external links section, I agreed and deleted it at 07:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC). Please note that it was a strong candidate as well for deletion per {{db-g11}} as unambiguous advertising or promotion. – Athaenara ✉ 19:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the explanation. I can't remember the number of editors contributing; but interesting that no one argued for its keeping. Sounds like it was the right decision. Sincerely, Harvester^talk 00:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 00:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vita Novus

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ see also: Vita Novus Treatment Center and John Haines (Vita Novus) contribs

why did you delete my vita novus post??

Why did you delete my user page on Vita Novus? I was careful to make a page that wasnt advertising, soapbox and copyright from my own website please respond as I am not happy with your actions John HainesVita Novus Treatment Center (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

And you deleted my John Haines (Vita Novus) post

what the hell is going on here I am not happy with your decisions I have read and reread the guidelines and all is just as I made both my submissions please respond ASAP can I go above your head? I want my posts back John HainesJohn Haines (Vita Novus) (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bunbury Cricket club

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not entirely sure how to go about this process so I apologise If I am going about this incorrectly but upon seeking Bunbury Cricket club I noted that it had been deleted by yourself. Having looked at the justification for it, I'm afraid I cannot agree. In terms of it being noteworthy, it is a charity which has raised £12m and has done so with the help of the likes of Eric Clapton and The Bee Gees as well as countless cricketers and other sports stars. A recent reference to this can be found here: http://www.whereseric.com/eric-clapton-news/303-eric-clapton-helps-celebrate-bunbury-cricket-clubs-25th-birthday

The BBC mentions the Bunbury cricket club in the following blog: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/tms/2009/05/bunbury.shtml

I hope the above is enough to merit the reinstatement of this page. If this is not the correct place to have posted this information would you be kind enough to point me in the right direction as I am new to this aspect of Wikipedia

Kind regards. Steven —Preceding unsigned comment added by BunburyCC (talk • contribs) 22:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm inclined to agree with you about its notability, so I recommend that you post on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Moontoast

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I wanted to find out what specifically made it read as advertising. Moontoast is a company, like many companies that have entries on Wikipedia, and we wanted to create a page with basic information about its existence. As noted in the talk file with User:Daniel_J._Leivick (which I guess was also deleted), we had added secondary sources to news sources and were in the process of adding references. Would it be possible to find out what made it read as advertising (that is not our purpose) and reinstate the entry until we can complete the verification items? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmcenerney (talk • contribs) 11:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I understand your interest (and conflict of interest) as CTO of the company you're trying to promote here, but I don't know what you mean by "the talk file" and can't find anything in Daniel J. Leivick's contribs which would explain it. Care to elaborate? – Athaenara ✉ 21:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm actually not the CTO; just a communications person doing some work for Moontoast. Having read many other companies entries on Wikipedia, I wrote something that was far less promotional than many of those that are already on Wikipedia. While I realize you do not want someone at a company to write about a company, that would assume someone else would write about it. Seems like it has to start somewhere and the entry I added was very straightforward about what it is. I was hoping to include some basic information about the company and then encourage others to edit as needed. How else does a company get started? cmcenerney 25, May 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.8.186 (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anuj Mittal

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Just a clarification - Anuj Mittal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) does exist (Anuj Mittal (Created on 24 May 2011 at 14:06)), I think the user made both accounts but was only editing with the anujmittal account. Thanks for the deletions! Syrthiss (talk) 13:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It looks like it might but this indicates that account was never registered, just a page created in that userspace by Anujajaymittal (talk · contribs). – Athaenara ✉ 13:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe that may just be server lag. In general, when you go to an nonexistent user's page User:Syrthissexampleuserpage you will see 'User account "Syrthissexampleuserpage" is not registered' in the editnotice at the top of the page. That was the first thing I thought too, that he just made the page of a nonexistent user. Kind of a moot point, though. ;) Syrthiss (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see what you mean. I didn't delete the other one because I don't want to be the only admin stepping on that new user's résumé. – Athaenara ✉ 13:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ajaymemoryman (talk · contribs) found as well, I wonder how many there are. – Athaenara ✉ 14:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Eesh. Me too. Probably not worth doing a SPI on, though. Right? Syrthiss (talk) 14:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maybe not at this early stage. I don't know, really, because I don't usually frequent that specialized area. – Athaenara ✉ 14:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jeff Hilimire

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of Wikipedia page "Jeff Hilimire"

Hi, on May 15, 2011 you deleted the wiki page for Jeff Hilimire- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Hilimire . Rasler1126 who, I think, created this page must have not have been keeping up with his wiki account to prevent this proposed deletion.

I would like you to restore this page. The reasoning of "Non-notable businesman, sources are publicity materials, press releases, coatrack spam for marketing agency." is incorrect. From what I recall, the information on the Jeff Hilimire wiki page was correct and accurate.

If you could please restore the page Jeff Hilimire and I would be grateful.

Thankyou,

Tondas13 (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Tondas13Reply

The entire {{proposed deletion}} rationale posted at User talk:Rasler1126#Proposed deletion of Jeff Hilimire can be seen in full there. It was quite accurate. Whatever your connection to Hilimire, it's clear that you're here to serve his interests (please see the Conflict of interest guideline). If you're intent upon promoting him further you can try Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 00:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dance Marathon at the University of Michigan

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dance Marathon at University of Michigan Webpage

Hello,

I am contacting you in regards to a page that was deleted just recently by you, Dance Marathon at university of Michigan. The page was deleted because it was a non-notable student group, but I do think we are notable. As one of the largest student organizations on our campus, and the largest student run non-profit in our state we would like to think of ourselves as notable. The deletion log said that there were not references in our article. If that is a problem, it can be amended to fit your criteria. We do use the wikipedia page and would love to have it back.

Thanks!

DMUM Leadership 98.250.93.232 (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm inclined to agree that it may have sufficient notability, but the article as written with only two sources (the organization's website and a single campus paper article) did not demonstrate that, so it would need more independent reliable sources. You might consider posting on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, but keep in mind that your conflict of interest is a concern. – Athaenara ✉ 00:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

HospitalityBex

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, you have deleted the HospitalityBex page without even bother to provide any explanation and response to the contest posted and demonstrate how was that page different from others like Birchstreet Inc, Which has similar writeup about a company. Is this the way wikipedia is administered? How would you consider references quoted from official government website as not valid and notable? How you done enough research about the topic and history of the company to determine that it is not worthy? How do you justify that a page of about one company is allowed to stay and the other is not? Isn't this double standard? I hope you can provide clear explanation to show that administrators are neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjkong (talk • contribs) 12:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Try the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 01:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

InTouch Credit Union

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

InTouchCreditUnion deletion/repost

There was originally a page created for InTouch Credit Union that got deleted for Unambiguous advertising by you. One of their employees (and my friend) had obviously created a page, but he then sent it to me as an unbiased party to revise it and take out the promoting language. I think it is relevant enough to be published on Wikipedia due to the fact that many other CUs are on Wikipedia and their assets are 800+ mil. I've submitted it on my personal page (although I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know if you can see that or not) and I think that it would be great for them and relevant enough for this site to be published. Let me know where I should go from here. Thanks. Clbutler (talk) 18:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC) • contribs) 13:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Try the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 01:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jane Fraser

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Athaenara- I see that you deleted the page on Jane Fraser, president of the Stuttering Foundation of America. I work with a firm that has been tasked with creating a functioning page for Ms. Fraser. I currently have a draft of a new page with references and have removed needless promotion and advertising. I am now creating the page-please let me know if there are any problems. Thanks, Bivings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bivings (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Central Singapore Community Development Council

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ see also: users Cscdc (talk · contribs), Centralsgcdc (talk · contribs), Centralsingaporecdc (talk · contribs)

You're the lastest (3rd) admin to delete this article as a G11. After it's second deletion I recreated it as a redirect to Community Development Council as it seemed a plausible search term. Clearly sometime after that someone converted it into a spammy article. Are you happy for the redirect to be recreated? I know that article is currently unsourced but given the number of google news hits I suspect it's probably notable. I suspect it may need protecting if the redirect it recreated given the number of G11 deletions. Dpmuk (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Given that the promotional activities of coi spas (single-purpose accounts with conflict of interest issues) have been involved, I'm reluctant to step into an area which a number of other editors and admins have been finding problematic. Yes, it could be created as a protected redirect. I suggest that you post that idea at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion for more eyes on it. – Athaenara ✉ 22:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

RudyRyan

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Can you not delete my user space I am creating a page and it is a work in progress. If you would actually have read the article you would have seen that it is not in fact blatant advertising because it holds a neutral point of view. Please. Do not delete my user space. Thank You. Rudyryan (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was precisely because I did read it that I saw its suitability for deletion per {{db-g11}} as spam. I posted the {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page because it is clear that your only interest in Wikipedia thus far is in promoting your fraternity here. – Athaenara ✉ 14:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am only a greek intern at UCSB and I was given the task of creating profiles for all the orgs of the United Fraternity and Sorority Council that are currently not on WIkipedia. You are not right within your assumptions and you should have more discretion and not abuse your power as an administrator. And it is not spam, I am merely trying to get information out there about a under represented area of college life that is often over shadowed by larger and older orgs. I these orgs all fulfill the notability requirements of Wikipedias guidelines.Rudyryan (talk) 06:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you want articles about such organizations to be retained on Wikipedia, they must be written in a wholly encyclopedic manner (my post on your talk page included links to pertinent and helpful pages in this regard). If you post on Requests for undeletion to ask that your userpage be restored, it should be as a subpage of your userspace, tagged as a {{userspace draft}}, to work on it further. You may find further guidance at the Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. – Athaenara ✉ 07:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank You for your insight. And I am working on a draft in a word documnet and have request the undeletion of the original page Sigma Chi Omega. Thank you. Rudyryan (talk) 08:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome – Athaenara ✉ 17:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

JCI Bangladesh

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

About JCI Bangladesh

Hello,

JCI is a global organization keeping footprint in more than 115 countries with a membership base more than 200,000 and promoting young professionals and entrepreneurs as active citizen. As being affiliated with the global organization JCI Bangladesh is also continuing it's effort to facilitate the development of young communities through various endeavors. You can find more details on our website: www.jci.cc.

Need your support by publishing this page to promote active citizenship for the community.

BR, Mahib Ekram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahibekram (talk • contribs) 05:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was spam and protected from re-creation after you created it the fourth time. Your userpage/résumé (see WP:NOTRESUME) was spam as well. – Athaenara ✉ 14:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

User Victoria Preobrazhenskaya

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A question about a deleted article

Hi, I'm new here and I was wondering if I could ask you a question. I asked this question on the noticeboards but I hope it's okay that I just paste what I wrote. The reason for this is because it concerns an article that you deleted.

User:Victoria Preobrazhenskaya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Victoria Preobrazhenskaya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I wasn't sure where this should go but anyway. Upon investigation I found out that a previous page called Victoria Preobrazhenskaya was deleted as db-g11. It seems that the user has resurrected that page and is planning on writing up another one. Contribs shows no other edits than the project at hand. That's why I didn't know where this should go.. it's a user page and not an actual article. I've looked all over but I can't seem to find any protocol for such a situation even though I've encountered it a couple of times. When a user starts making an autobiographical page using their user page, are we supposed to let them make the page on their user page to their heart's content, and put a deletion tag on them only once they try to publish? Or do we nip it at the bud and tag for speedy deletion under db-spam? Can someone please clarify? Sorry, I'm kinda new at this stuff.--Motherfrakker (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks in advance. --Motherfrakker (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd tag it {{db-g11}} and post a {{uw-coi}} warning on their talk page. When the spam is on a user page, I point them to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox and Wikipedia:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages? as well. – Athaenara ✉ 13:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pricelock

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

→ in re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pricelock
→ see also: Tphb (talk · contribs), Cdowning707 (talk · contribs), Hardenteam (talk · contribs), Hardenpartners (talk · contribs)

I requested salting protection on Pricelock which you speed deleted twice under G11.. Care to chime in? Swim900 (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Creditloan.com

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted Article Creditloan.com

Hi Athaenara,

I'm told I need to discuss an undelete request with you. The article on CreditLoan.com was deleted on the basis of unambiguous advertising or promotion; however, the criteria states that "An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." I can't find anything in the article on CreditLoan that isn't neutral. The contents are referenced, no opinions were included. No negative information was found on the Web or it would have been included. The article explains what the website is, and who is behind it. CreditLoan.com is a high traffic information site, with a large number of financial articles, and is described and referenced in the Wikipedia article, but no recommendations or suggestions of patronage are made. Please reconsider and undelete it.

Thanks for your consideration, RiverWriter (talk) 19:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was tagged {{db-g11}} by Rd232 (talk · contribs). Its focus was on the sorts of things the site owners would like people to know, such as how many articles it has, its location, its Alexa ranking and security precautions, etc., without significant independent reliable sources which might attest to its notability in a neutral fashion. I read it and agreed that it was primarily promotional (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline) so I followed through with deletion. – Athaenara ✉ 20:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ourinternet page

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hello,

I'm wondering why my newly created page devoted to Our Internet has been deleted? This page contains the information about a web hosting provider Our Internet and their services. I thought this is good addition to a Web hosting section. At least when I was trying to find a reliable web hosting provider using Wikipedia earlier, there were not too many of them. And all of the pages there contained very similar information.

Thanks,

Bdgls (talk) 15:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Restored per your complaint (it's still subject to deletion). – Athaenara ✉ 17:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see you deleted Ourinternet as a G11, then restored it. I deleted it as a G11 as well. An IP contacted me, (presumably Bdgls_, asking for it to me restored, citing your decision to restore it. I'm going to give it a second look - I recall it being rather spammy, but maybe salvageable. I'm inclined to userfy, and add some feedback, but I'm informing you in case you would like to weigh in.--SPhilbrick T 12:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I userfied and provided some feedback; not asking you to do anything, but as you were involved originally, wanted to keep you informed. --SPhilbrick T 12:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I undeleted it because I saw it as an opportunity for the new user Bdgls to see an additional result. As I expected, it was deleted again because it's basic "this is what we have and this is what we do" spam, not an encyclopedia article, and has no independent WP:RS indicating any notability. – Athaenara ✉ 17:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Biogamer Girl deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioGamer Girl

I had earlier declined a G7 on the article, as a few other editors had edited the article - also, the AfD tag on an article explicitly says that the article should not be blanked during the AfD. This is a procedural thing - I would have been surprised if the consensus had changed significantly during the rest of the discussion resulting in a keep!

Regards, -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\^{[alternative account of Phantomsteve]} 05:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Amandadyar and XXmAsTeRsHaKe were the two authors of the "substantial content" per the WP:CSD#G7 criterion, and both of them explicitly requested deletion by adding the {{db-g7}} tag to the page. The purpose of AfD is not to flog or slow-roast coi spas for a week for having tried to use Wikipedia to promote their product. Their tagging, after some discussion, indicated to me that they both understood our policies and guidelines sufficiently well for their requests to be accepted in good faith.

Compare to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozone layer formation, where the author nominated the article for AfD but other editors suggested that some of the content should be merged into another article. Summary deletion per db-g7 short-circuited a potentially productive discussion and the utility of the page name as a redirect. – Athaenara ✉ 16:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, I had just noticed that the requests had occurred during the AfD - personally, I ignore these unless they are for copyvios or attack pages, but this is a fair application of IAR, thanks for your explanation -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\^{[alternative account of Phantomsteve]} 17:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 17:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bruce Berman (Brody Berman Associates)

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara, You have recently delete the Bruce Berman article. I have a basic understanding of the reasons, but I was wondering if you can give me some advice on how to re-create the article prevent it from being labeled as "unambiguous advertising." Bruce Berman has written many books and contributed greatly to the press and I would really like to see his actions recognized. Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbaassistant (talk • contribs) 17:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page in the hope of helping you understand how your predicament is viewed on this encyclopedia. – Athaenara ✉ 22:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vanguard Cleaning Systems

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Athaenara. You deleted a page that was created in 2009 and I'd like to rewrite/repost a more objective version. The page was entitled Vanguard Cleaning Systems. Can you help? Heistenmark (talk) 04:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it's highly unlikely that you, a VP of the company (or any of your employees), would approach the subject with neutral objectivity per the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) guideline. As I've spent thousands of hours cleaning up after spammers, I have precisely zero interest in assisting efforts to promote anything on Wikipedia (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline). I posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page to cast a little light on your position here. – Athaenara ✉ 07:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is this MapR advertising?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I see a lot of sites like this - they seem to be a subtle form of advertising. What is your opinion? --Greenmaven (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It certainly does seem to be intended to promote the company. Pages like this are usually created by spas (as in this case) with no other interest in Wikipedia, which suggests a coi. I posted a {{uw-coi}} on User talk:Markkitenga and added a few tags to the article. It could be tagged {{db-g11}} for deletion as spam or nominated for AFD. – Athaenara ✉ 21:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

World Rally Radio

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nomination of World Rally Radio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Rally Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Rally Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

You deleted the article, and another admin restored it. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Carbon trade exchange

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would you mind redeleting? N^oformation ^Talk 10:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 04:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:Vasai Pathology Laboratory

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: Vasai Pathology Laboratory (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

About CSD

Dear Athaenara,

I saw that you deleted an article which I proposed for speedy deletion. Since you are one of the admins, I want to bring this to your notice, In a hurry I have put this page User:Vasai Pathology Laboratory for CSD under G2 instead of G11. Please do have a look on it. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 11:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't apply {{db-g2}} to such a userpage. At any rate January deleted it per WP:CSD#G11 as spam and Elockid blocked the account. – Athaenara ✉ 21:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mark Marxer

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User Mark Marxer page deletion

Hello,

I was not able to post a response to the debate regarding the deletion of my page prior to you deleting it. The page was not a fake article, as "frankie" claimed, I requested the username be renamed as I simply didn't understand why "user" was included in the username.

Furthermore, in response to the argument: "WP:FAKEARTICLE. The subject doesn't appear to be notable. I love the sentence "A native of the U.S. state of California (he grew up in Eugene Oregon),..." ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 20:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC" This was simply a typo that has been fixed.

This page was simply an autobiographical piece and if you could give me any helpful suggestions as to how I can re-post without conflict I would appreciate it. Thank you! Mark Marxer 17:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmarxer (talk • contribs)

I don't know whether you've read WP:NOTRESUME or what part of the Wikipedia:Spam guideline you don't understand. I didn't delete it as a fake userpage, I deleted it per WP:CSD#G11 as spam. The lack of a phone number or a website link hardly made it any less unambiguous promotion. You are what is known in Wikipedia parlance as a coi spa: a single-purpose accound with a conflict of interest. You may get some good advice on the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, and you may appeal to Wikipedia:Deletion review. – Athaenara ✉ 22:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Liz Davenport

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara you took down the page I've been editing for breach of copyright Liz Davenport. I was still editing the page heavily with the help of another admin Grim. I've read the notice and have copyright license to use the information. I'm sorry I'm pretty new to this. What do you suggest I do to get the page onto the site? Should I launch it in a sandbox or is there come other way. Lizdavenport777 (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, I deleted it as spam per WP:CSD#G11. You need to read the {{uw-coi}} on your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 07:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Liz Davenport Deletion

Sorry I checked the message again and you said it was advertising and didn't make much sense. I'm keen to rewrite the page and return it.

Should I just make it one parragraph, what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizdavenport777 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

New discussions go to the bottom of a page, not above older discussions or inside a section devoted to another topic, per WP:TALK. Have you read the conflict of interest information which was posted by another user on your talk page? – Athaenara ✉ 07:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I'm not having much luck ;) I culled the page right down just with the key features all rewriten. Is it ok now? Lizdavenport777 (talk) 08:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm getting the impression that you don't understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free website for anyone to use for any purposes of their own. Have you read What Wikipedia is not? Have you read any of the warnings against self-promotion on your talk page? – Athaenara ✉ 08:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Themes for Films

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Could you take a look at this article and its history. I proposed it for deletion. --Greenmaven (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deadoralive42 and Wikepediakid have both removed article maintenance tags from the articles they've edited and have shown no interest in other topics here. I restored the multiple issues tags for two articles and will look into it further. – Athaenara ✉ 23:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you --Greenmaven (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't know whether Sell is as notable as Deadoralive42's promotional editing (including repeatedly removing article maintenance tags) tries to make it appear. The two articles could be nominated for WP:AFD or you could first take these issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard WP:COIN for more views of the problem. – Athaenara ✉ 06:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:Durdans Hospital‎

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

User:Durdans Hospital‎ was recreated after you speedy deleted it. Time for a wikislap? --Biker Biker (talk) 09:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re-deleted with a stronger warning. – Athaenara ✉ 10:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Baliem Arabica

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please take a look at User:Baliemarabica

This may have some value as an article, but is clearly not a properly constructed 'User page'. I do not wish to mess with a User page, but perhaps you could do something useful with it? Or advise me? I could improve the article if you create it. --Greenmaven (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interesting, the user's talk page has the same borderline advertising content, though potentially an article as you said. Wikipedia talk:User pages is on more than 2,000 watchlists so I'd expect a fairly prompt response if you ask about it there. – Athaenara ✉ 07:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have located a website from which this content has been cut and pasted at [5]. Can I, as a non-admin, edit someone's User page and/or User Talk page (i.e. remove all the content leaving only a 'welcome' template and an explanation on the talk page, and a small stub on a new suitably named article (i.e. Baliem Arabica)? --Greenmaven (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for tracking that down. I deleted the userpage per WP:CSD#G12 and I think your idea for the talk page is a good one. – Athaenara ✉ 10:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Richard Pearce

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi you've deleted me!

Hi Athaenara, you've deleted me. I do exist. I'm all over the internet and many references regarding my life and career can easily be found. In addition many were actually added to my page. Can you put me back? Best wishes Richard Pearce — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravingmadam (talk • contribs) 19:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

That page was tagged 11:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Exok (talk · contribs), whose concern was Notability queried since 2007, no reliable sources or evidence of notability added since that time. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have objected or addressed the concern by finding and adding independent WP:RS. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 03:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well i guess as i can't even find a tilde on a keyboard, such a task is way beyond me. Back to anonymity! Probably no bad thing. Whoever put the original page on there made loads of mistakes anyway! And getting those corrected was a herculean task. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravingmadam (talk • contribs) 04:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

hey

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

	hey
	hi there i dont know what i supposed to do to make a wiki page for me im a model Faisal8888 (talk) 13:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're not supposed to. Please read the {{uw-coi}} warning which AdAstra reloaded (talk · contribs) posted on your talk page. – Athaenara ✉ 15:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:Wikiprowriter

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ in re: Wikiprowriter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

What a timely edit conflict! And I was merely blanking it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm with MER-C: get it gone. – Athaenara ✉ 05:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

John J. Powers (comedian)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jkinzler777 (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)--Jkinzler777 (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Hello, I have rewritten the article you deleted last week. I would be grateful for a reconsideration. The article is brief, non-soapbox, and simply editorial. Mr. Powers has a fan following of over 10,000 and increasing all the time. I believe he will become even more "wiki-worthy" as time goes on. I would appreciate your taking a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jkinzler777/John_J._Powers_(actor,_comedian) prior to my moving it over. I appreciate all you do. Respectfully, Jan KinzlerReply

Dew Tour

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Athaenara. I see that you deleted some talk page for some Dew Tour articles. I was wondering if you could tell me what account created those talk pages and if there was any sort of substantial message there. I wrote a lengthy report here but to summarize, there was a large COI with about 25 different pages that were all deleted. As of until just now, there has been no real response from the company that was responsible for creating all of the articles. I'd like to see if they understand what happened or have questions. OlYeller^Talktome 10:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I deleted three pages which were in the 06:12, 22 July 2011 (UTC) update of the orphaned talk pages database report. In August 2009 98.23.15.184 created Talk:Dew Tour 2008 with 'Kurtis fleming' which RP459 replaced with {{talk header}}. In October 2010 AngChenrui replaced that with {{WikiProject Multi-sport events}} and created Talk:Dew Tour 2007 and Talk:Dew Tour 2009 with the same template. I was not aware of the other pages, coi spas, socking, etc. – Athaenara ✉ 11:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

SData

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SData

This page has been deleted and it would appear you are the person who deleted it. I wasnt aware that this was going to be deleted, nor given suitable time to address the issues as to why it was not suitable. Hope you can help by un-deleting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpearson004 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

That page was tagged 11:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by RadioFan (talk · contribs), whose concern was No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. It was highly promotional as well (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline). Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion, but do keep in mind that your conflict of interest is a concern (I posted a {{uw-coi}} notice on your talk page to inform you further). – Athaenara ✉ 15:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

International Art Incubator Foundation

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Athaenara, about International Art Incubator Foundation deleted article. I think you are right it was too promotional, my friend who post the article never used before Wikipedia and since he found many items not encyclopedia relevant he thought to be in right. Let me ask if you can remove this ugly stain for the foundation from wikipedia. Many thanks Best DanielBelsson daniel.belsson@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielBelsson (talk • contribs) 07:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why did you add add the promotional introductory paragraph of the deleted article to your talk page? Are you the same user? – Athaenara ✉ 08:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

No I'm not the same user. I'm artist and fan of International Art Incubator Foundation, they have more than 25.000 fans on facebook. So, they have thought to insert into Wikipedia something about their initiative. Anyway I promise I don't write anything on wikipedia about this, nor they will do it. Just allow them to start again when will be ecyclopedia relevant :), please. DanielBelsson daniel.belsson@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielBelsson (talk • contribs) 13:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ahmed Abdel Azeem

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am concerned that the above page has been deleted. The same person deleted Gihan Sami Soliman, which probably deserved deletion. Both pages were heavily edited by Gihan Sami Soliman under the name Doveye. Her own self-created page Gihan Sami Soliman could not be verified and there were issues around NPOV and Notability. The discussion on her Talk page might interest you. However, I am concerned that Azeem, as a published scientist of some repute in his field, was sufficiently notable, and the article was of good enough quality to merit a 'keep' verdict. Please will you take a look at this? --Greenmaven (talk) 21:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you have sufficient independent WP:RS to challenge an AfD, go to deletion review. (Doveye71 was briefly blocked after a sockpuppetry case.) – Athaenara ✉ 05:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Global Innovation Through Science & Technology

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Athaenara,

The person who created the wiki page for Global Innovation Through Science & Technology (GIST Initiative) has recently left the office so we were not aware that you had erased the page.

This is the message that appears when one gets to the page

•12:34, 27 July 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "Global Innovation through Science and Technology" ‎ (WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection: concern was 'no evidence of notability' - promotional, no independent WP:RS). When I go to the WP:RS link it explains that it does not have a reliable source which is strange since the page was created by CRDF Global staff which is the organization running the GIST Initiative and we provided the links to our webpage.

Please advise on the steps to take to rectify this problem and be able to recreate a wiki page for GIST Initiative.

Best

GISTinitiative (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC) GISTinitiativeReply

Yuritzi Acosta GIST/STEP CRDF Global 1530 Wilson Blvd. 3rd FL Arlington, VA 22209 Skype: yuritzi.acosta.crdf Tel. 703-526-9720 www.crdf.org; www.gistinitiative.org

Please follow us in social media : [removed facebook/twitter/linkedin links - ref WP:SPAM guideline] — Preceding unsigned comment added by GISTinitiative (talk • contribs) 16:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

User Oldvinyl (talk · contribs) seems to be the person who recently left your office. That page was tagged 08:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by RHaworth (talk · contribs). Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. You may list it at Requests for undeletion, but keep in mind that your conflict of interest is a concern (I provided more information for you by posting a {{uw-coi}} warning about that on your talk page). – Athaenara ✉ 17:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

ECREA

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Hi

could you please respond to my request not to delete the entry ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association

I wrote the following as a response to the claim that the page is advertising an organisation only: This page should not be speedy deleted because... --AnnKaun (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

it describes the work and structure of an idealistic, non-commercial association that is connecting European Media and Communication Scholars. It is one of the leading scholarly associations when it comes to media studies. There are Wikipedia entries that refer to similar associations (see ICA - Internation Communication Association and ESN - network of the IAMCR).

The page has been written by people that are loosely linked to the association, but that have enough knowledge to write an encyclopedia entry.

We hope that you can re-think the deletion! We are not advertising, we are informing! thanks for considering. anne

Furthermore ECREA is named in several other entries on here and should be explained and defined as well. See for example the entry "communication studies" mentions ECREA: "National Communication Association (NCA): The main national professional organization covering many of the areas of communication studies in the U.S. International Communication Association is the main international association for communication studies, which combines an older focus on quantitatively based social science studies with newer critical and cultural studies of communicative phenomena. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Association for Business Communication (ABC) International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) Society for Technical Communication (STC) Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) European Communication Research and Education Association (ECREA) is the main European association for communication studies. European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing (EATAW) is the main European association for writing studies. Association for Teachers of Technical Writing (ATTW) International Association for Media and Communications Research (IAMCR) is a large international association for communication studies. ECREA is the main European association for communication studies"

I ask you to reconsider the deletion. best a. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnKaun (talk • contribs) 06:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

ECREA (2)

Sockpuppet investigation

Dear Athaenara,

I was informed that you have expressed a concern that my account may be a sock puppet of AnnKaun. As this is not the case, how can I contribute to clearing my name.

On the COI issue - If I understand the guidelines correctly COI editing is discouraged but not forbidden. My edits of "European Communication Research and Education Association" were actually aimed at improving the neutrality of the article and adding references. I'll be happy to hear if there is anything I can do better.

Yours sincerely, ncarpent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncarpent (talk • contribs) 22:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Five accounts, one of which is yours, have edited primarily or solely one article, but there is currently no active sockpuppet investigation of the situation (the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy may clarify the issue for you). – Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

ECREA (3)

[Original section heading: "Accusations of suckpoppeteering and advertising"]

Please re-review the ECREA entry. Your feedback and critique has been useful and attempts have been made to address the issues you raise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Communication_Research_and_Education_Association. Please also note that Nulje is not a sockpuppet of AnneKaun. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nulje (talk • contribs) 19:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rising Stars of India

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Undelete request for Rising Stars of India

This website is to help people with talent who can upload their videos online and let others know their talent. This website will also help people find their singing group to perform somewhere. This website will also help others users to find out people with similar interests ad communicate productively. This will enhance their talent and be motivated enough to perform. Such a website is very important for people who cannot perform on stage all the time. They can interact fruitfully online with others of similar interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramgirm (talk • contribs) 15:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was deleted because it was promotional (see the Wikipedia:Spam guideline) and there was no indication that it met the Wikipedia:Notability requirements. – Athaenara ✉ 21:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rising Stars of India

Please check out the latest details in discussion tab. How about the following text:

"‘Rising Stars of India’ is a social networking site launched by ZonoPact Entertainment in 2011. This website is designed & developed by ZonoPact Infotech to help people with talents to interact with each other and enhance their talents. This website is for people to upload their music, dance, song and act videos and to interact with other upcoming stars. This is for fruitful interaction between various talented people around the world." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.147.76 (talk) 17:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The comments in my first reply above apply here as well: it is promotional and there is no indication of notability per this encyclopedia's standards. – Athaenara ✉ 21:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am unable to understand what is exactly expected. As a third person to this, I understand that this website is very useful useful as I myself was searching for such a site and found it online. This matter contains only 2 lines of facts about the website. Just as a matter of concern, have you checked any other social networking website wiki? Have you seen the numbers they all mention and have pages long of self boasting and self promoting sentences? Here, I have mentioned 'what' it is and 'how' is it relevant. I guess that is what is needed. So, please indicate which part of it you are not happy about.

Check this one if that satisfies you: ‘Rising Stars of India’ is a social networking site launched in 2011.' If this is even problematic and SELF BOASTING, is it ok to leave just the name ‘Rising Stars of India’ and let people find out the details by themselves? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.147.76 (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you bring your concerns to Wikipedia:Editor assistance, someone there may provide the guidance you need. – Athaenara ✉ 23:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ryan Totka

Latest comment: 13 years ago12 comments4 people in discussion

Page deleted without response

The User page "Ryan Totka" was set for speedy delete this week. As the third party contractor who wrote the article, I contested the deletion and requested advisement as to what I could do to make the article more "encyclopedic". I received no response, and found the article deleted today. Can the article be un-deleted so that I can make adjustments on it to make it fit better under the Wiki parameters? Also, once I make the adjustments, do I need to name it differently since this page was deleted under "Ryan Totka"? RTotka (talk) 22:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I suggest you study the {{uw-coi}} warning which was posted on your talk page and seriously reconsider your intention to re-create the article. – Athaenara ✉ 23:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm a bit confused about this at the moment, and so far have not gotten answers to my questions. This is not the first BIO that I have helped create, Wiki and otherwise. I modeled that BIO after other Wiki pages that are still on Wikipedia and have been for quite some time. I am in no way affiliated with Ryan Totka or his companies, other than writing this page, as he sent me the picture and a couple of links. I am a third party contractor who is completely neutral, whether or not it sounded that way in the initial posting. The screen name information was created under Mr. Totka's name for the purpose of creating the page. Should I decide to re-write it, and it fit the neutral tone and resume style, as other pages clearly do, will the article be allowed to be published? I don't understand why other BIO's are clearly published live, but this one cannot be. 67.142.178.21 (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is there some part of because it only promotes an entity, person or product and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic (see the {{db-g11}} template) which you don't understand? The page you wrote was irretrievable spam. – Athaenara ✉ 02:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your kind response. My question remains however; if the article is re-written so that it is not "irretrievable spam" can it be published? Please see example article as posted on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penelope_Jean. This is the intended format for the page "Ryan Totka". 67.142.178.21 (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

That page is spam as well. Is Success10 (talk · contribs) another account of yours? How many accounts have you used to write articles as a "third party contractor"? – Athaenara ✉ 18:15, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am a third party contractor/freelance writer. I write about many things and for many people, most of which has nothing to do with Wiki. This is the first Wiki that I personally have created under an account. Generally I organize the information or edit/proofread articles or pages that aren't organized well, that's it. I work independent from these people and their companies, etc. Many people aren't proficient with formatting and organization, as you well know I'm sure. My primary issue here, was that I wanted someone to tell me what needed to happen, because I didn't know, and wasn't getting clarity. Now that I have such clarity, I will not bother you further. I appreciate your wonderfully professional, polite attitude toward a stranger seeking guidance. Have a good day. RTotka (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you're not Ryan Totka, why are you using his name on this encyclopedia? – Athaenara ✉ 04:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I used the account that is in his name so that we both could view the edits that I had made to his original intended article. I am an editor/proofer/organizer, who was attempting to help him get his CORP BIO published successfully. I have never met him personally, and am in fact, a complete third party. I independently researched the information and compiled the article, then he verified the accuracy of the information that I had gathered. Since we live in different states and schedules, and have never met, it made more sense for us both to have access to view the work in progress. If this is an issue, which neither of us would imagine since we both agreed to mutual access, I do apologize. RTotka (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

And with that relationship, which so clearly compromises neutrality (see the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy), you didn't think you had a conflict of interest? What you and your client considered "accuracy" was not encyclopedic but highly promotional. – Athaenara ✉ 04:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I've deleted Penelope Jean and tagged Tali Giat to receive the same treatment as a complete fluff piece. To RTotka - read and understand WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:V before agreeing to write more biographies. SmartSE (talk) 07:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yippee and thanks for stalking! – Athaenara ✉ 08:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Prologis

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Undelete "Prologis" page

Athaenara,

Our company changed names from "ProLogis" to "Prologis" (simply lowercasing the L, a change that resulted from a merger). Our intention was simply to change the name of the Wiki entry, but apparently the process required taking the page "ProLogis" down and putting the page "Prologis" up.

Now it appears the page "Prologis" has been deleted as well. The company still exists, and everything on the page is verifiable. Can you please undelete the page so that we may continue to edit and improve it?

Regards,

Michael Deas Sr. Communications Manager 63.76.147.114 (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

That page was tagged at 10:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by ErrantX (talk · contribs), whose concern was Fails WP:CORP, no sources of note appear to exist which cover this company independently and in significant depth. ErrantX's concern was endorsed at 16:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC) by Ihcoyc (talk · contribs), who added Also note leading global non-neutral text and blatant advertising. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which time other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week (note that Prologis was the article and ProLogis was a redirect to it). You may list it at Requests for undeletion if you wish, but your conflict of interest is a concern. – Athaenara ✉ 17:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for this info. I am very new to this and would be interested in learning how companies deal with the conflict of interest issue, i.e., how does a company start and maintain its own Wikipedia entry? Is it even possible?

Also, an editor/contributor to the article, was not notified of the concerns noted above. Is there something I'm doing wrong to have missed this notification? I knew only of the entry's deletion because my boss noticed it was missing. 63.76.147.114 (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You need to read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. It would help if you identify the registered account(s) you were using as well. – Athaenara ✉ 19:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

EGAIS

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Athaenara, I am contacting you to get to know more details about the delation of the EGAIS contribution from Wikipedia. Just wanted to ask you what is not allowed on wikipedia. EGAIS is a EU funded project dealing with one of the biggest and hottest issue of ethics, the need for an ethical governance. This is a very strong topic at the moment across the experts in the field and we thought it was good to let other know about this project and its aims. Thanks a lot for your help! Alpbet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpbet (talk • contribs) 06:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I posted a {{uw-coi}} notice on your talk page in the hope that you will study some of the pertinent policies and guidelines which relate to your concerns. – Athaenara ✉ 23:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Iteris

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of article on Iteris

I wrote the original content for Iteris. It was my first foray into writing an article for Wikipedia. I noted within a short time that the article had been tagged as marketing material. I rewrote the article with the intention of making it more encyclopedic. I thought I had done that well and the page remained for awhile. I don't check the site very often for changes and just discovered that the Iteris article had been deleted. Since I don't check very often, I didn't have an opportunity to comment on your request for Speedy Deletion or fix any specific issues. I have two requests:

Can you help me put the article back in place? I believe the technology Iteris develops is worth including within Wikipedia, e.g. Iteris is mentioned in the 2001 portion of the Timeline section of Lane departure warning system. I want to make sure the Iteris article conforms to the Wikipedia guidelines.
Can you recommend tools to monitor pages? I could have acted before the deletion occurred had I known. Also, I once had to deal with a vandal on the Iteris page.

Thanks in advance,

IterisWebmaster (talk) 16:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, it looks like you are what is known on Wikipedia as a coi spa, a single purpose account with a conflict of interest. I posted a {{uw-coi}} warning on your talk page to provide you with more information about how this is viewed here. – Athaenara ✉ 20:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The intention for the account name was to be open and forthcoming. The intention of the article was to stick within the Wikipedia guidelines. Can you provide me with the last content on the site? I will edit it further (e.g. more third-party references) and post it as me ([David Rossman]) to fit better with the Wikipedia guidelines. I can even provide you a copy for review before posting. Thank you. IterisWebmaster (talk) 16:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are free to explain your intentions and desires, as you have here, at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. I'd rather not undelete it myself. – Athaenara ✉ 23:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

eSecureData

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion of article on eSecureData

My concern is with the deletion of an article I just saved, "eSecuredata" for the following reason: (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: more at User talk:Henriwrites -please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox)

I'd like to point out that the article for the company was based on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%261_Internet">1&1 Internet</a>, which is a similar company to eSecureData. I was careful to try to find as many outside sources as possible other than that found on the company's website. If you read the Wiki entry on 1&1 Internet, you will see that I have tried to maintain a similar tone and used a voice that was neutral.

Henriwrites (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Eeekster (talk · contribs) tagged it for speedy deletion per {{db-g11}} as spam. The citations were almost exclusively to the company website and there were no indications of notability except an award from top10dedicatedhosting.com. You may try Wikipedia:Deletion review if you wish. – Athaenara ✉ 00:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Steve Berke

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Time to salt, maybe? Singularity42 (talk) 02:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 02:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reproductive Health Access Project

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why was the Reproductive Health Access Project page deleted?

Hi Athaenara,

We are new to Wikipedia and spend sometime creating an informational page on our organization and it seems you deleted it on August 8th. Can we get it back to fix whatever the problem was?

RHAP123 18:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RHAP123 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I didn't delete the article, I deleted the empty redirect to it. – Athaenara ✉ 01:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Select Business Credit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Recently Deleted Post "Select Business Credit"

Hi Athaenara,

You deleted a post for "Select Business Credit" and because it seemed "unimportant." I would like a chance to add to it to make it more relevant to readers. I'm hoping you will give me that chance. Please advise. Thanks very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namlerep (talk • contribs) 20:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, I deleted it per WP:CSD#G11 as spam. – Athaenara ✉ 01:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lord Hector Diono

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

→ see also: Infodarktownusa (talk · contribs) and DarkTownIslandDefJam (talk · contribs)

Can you look at this?

Hi, Athaenara. This article was on my watchlist as I had attempted communication with it's creator (afterwards blocked for username problems). The article has reappeared, created by someone with a seemingly similar promotional intent. I can't see the original content so I can't tell if the current article is any different than the one you deleted. I have checked the artist list for Island Def Jam Digital Music Group and the article subject is not listed on the website. The current article needs wikification but I don't want to waste my time if the thing needs prodding or AfD-ing. If you could offer an opinion about the article's survivability I would appreciate it. Thanks Tiderolls 03:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

None of the versions were much different from this. – Athaenara ✉ 22:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Enabling Desktop Grids for e-Science

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, the editor who created this article (PRODded by me and deleted by you) is objecting to the deletion (see the discussion here). He's a newbie (at least as far as number of edits is concerned), so I have posted some advice on his talk page (and answered several emails from him), but perhaps it would be good if you had a look, too, because he claims that the PROD deletion was not according to procedure. Thanks. --Crusio (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I found no communications from Ademman to me for July of any year (per "I told this on July 29 to Athaenara" on the user's talk page), deleted or not, though another account or an anonIP may have been used. The deletion was straightforward and Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion would be the usual route for contesting it. – Athaenara ✉ 22:14, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hemp woman

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

FYI

See the deleted contributions of Fortblue (talk · contribs). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wow, if "hemp woman are still struggling for survival today" because of people like me I'm almost tempted to undelete. Think I should? – Athaenara ✉ 22:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Only if you are not willing to accept that you will be responsible for the collapse of the planet. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

Now I'm in the throes of either dyslexia or an incomprehensible ethical dilemma. – Athaenara ✉ 00:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

That was rather hard for me to write, I probably shouldn't edit when I'm tired. How about I rewrite that: yes? no? maybe? maybe not? I'm not sure that makes any sense either. Must be nap time.-- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

It might bite, better we don't touch it. – Athaenara ✉ 00:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Getting Results the Agile Way

Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Regarding Getting Results the Agile Way

Athaenara --

Can you share your thinking to support your conclusion that Getting Results the Agile Way is unambiguous advertising?
Can you share specific examples from the actual text you deleted, Getting Results the Agile Way, to show what needs to be fundamentally re-written?

You must see something in your experience that I don't see, and I would appreciate learning from you.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InfoArtist (talk • contribs) 18:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I posted a {{uw-coi}} note (which you should study) on your talk page to help you with this. Note for example Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view [and] verifiability of information. – Athaenara ✉ 19:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've posted a screed at their talk page in response to a helpme. You might care to look it over. (You just beat me to the Alligator denim - why did they repost it with the spam tag on already? ) Peridon (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your 'screed' was excellent and I hope InfoArtist reads it (I removed the duplicate spam). Alligator denim ... who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of coi spas? The Shadow knows?
(* The dark side covers it pretty well.) – Athaenara ✉ 19:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

* I meant Wikipedia:Grief, actually! – Athaenara ✉ 20:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Timeline of 28 August 2011 (UTC) timestamps:

00:19: page created
00:20: tagged {{db-g11}} by DoDo Bird Brain (talk · contribs)
01:14: deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs)
16:42: page re-created
17:06: tagged {{db-g11}} by Noq (talk · contribs)
18:27: deleted by me

(For clarification.) – Athaenara ✉ 01:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Athaenara -- I read your book, Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, as well as the links you shared (along with your inside comments, that don't seem collaborative) Peridon has been helpful, and pointed out that I didn't include some of the 3rd party references that are available, and I didn't note that J.D. Meier is an existing author with multiple, relevant books with Microsoft Press, which is relevant for notability. I want to figure this out before I add pages for additional time management systems including Covey, Robbins, and de Bono. I started with Getting Results, because it is the one that's been referenced in conjunction with Covey, David Allen, the Pomodoro Technique, by authorities like Stepcase Lifehack and others. InfoArtist (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kleanse Method

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Athaenara

Hello,

I am new to Wikipedia and I just applied for a patent on legal zoom under The Kleanse Method. Could you help me set up my page since you marked it for deletion?

Thanks

BrB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackbbr (talk • contribs) 09:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I didn't mark it for deletion, I deleted it as spam per {{db-g11}} after another editor tagged it. I posted a {{uw-coi}} on your talk page to help you out with the issues. – Athaenara ✉ 10:02, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

FilmCrave

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Why was FilmCrave deleted?

Hello. I run a movie site called filmcrave.com. For several years there was a long standing wiki entry that simply said that FilmCrave existed and what it was. Now I go to check wiki and I do not see it anywhere? Can you explain why it was deleted and what I can do to get it back?

Thank you 68.34.132.98 (talk) 01:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)AlexReply

That page was tagged 23:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Swpb (talk · contribs), whose concern was nn web (WP:N, WP:WEB). Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. You may list it at Requests for undeletion, but your conflict of interest is a concern. – Athaenara ✉ 01:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info. I have submitted to have it reinstated. I hope that my interest in the matter is not a true conflick as I just want what was there back. This is not spam, there is a legitimate reason why the site was listed by someone and it should remain as other sites that are very similar have a wiki entry. FilmCrave is linked by other wiki entries as well as a reliable source. Thanks again and I hope you can help me get it restored.Heartiscontentious (talk) 02:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not crazy about the request coming from an editor with a COI myself, but it is contesting a proposed deletion. That's pretty automatic to be granted. Do you think the prior speedy deletes or the conflict are enough to overcome that? I'm inclined to grant the request—and to notify Swpb of the restoration so he can nominate it for AfD if he so chooses—but I wanted to check with you first. —C.Fred (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sounds OK to me. – Athaenara ✉ 02:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

User Mhurst08

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, when I recently created User:Mhurst08/Sober Living by the Sea as a user request, I noticed that you tagged this account as a sockpuppet on 21 April 2009. I was wondering if it might have got forgotten since, though I am no expert in the procedures, would have thought that it should have been resolved one way or another? TerriersFan (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I flagged Mhurst08 (talk · contribs) and Mhurstcrc (talk · contribs) so the similar usernames and editing patterns would be more visible to other editors and admins who deal with COI and spam issues. They're just heads-up warnings. – Athaenara ✉ 01:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you; a helpful explanation. TerriersFan (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome. – Athaenara ✉ 02:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soccer Article

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo i am from Greece and i want to make an article in Wikipedia about amateur club which i am coaching. I made it in Greece wikipedia but they delete. I want to ask you if you can help me and give me advises how the article will be ok with wikipedia rulles. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billiarakos (talk • contribs) 16:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't know anything about soccer clubs in Greece, but I posted a {{uw-coi}} message on your talk page to help you with issues which may arise. – Athaenara ✉ 03:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Weavers Way Co-op

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

While I did not author the Weavers Way Co-op page, I question why you removed it. As a dynamic organization with over 5,000 members, a strong urban farming program, an educational arm and a newspaper with a circulation of over 23,000, Weavers Way is the largest co-op in Philadelphia. Any chance we could get it reinstated, or would I have to start from scratch? I saw the deletion was in part because sources for the info on it was not cited, but it appeared to come primarily from the Weavers Way website www.weaversway.coop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonmcgo (talk • contribs) 21:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

That page was tagged 00:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC) for {{proposed deletion}} by Swpb (talk · contribs), whose concern was undersourced and no indication of notability, with no improvement since 2007. Per WP:PROD, seven days passed during which other editors could have addressed the concern or objected. That did not happen, so it was deleted after a week. If you wish, you may list it at Requests for undeletion. (Who is "we" btw?) – Athaenara ✉ 10:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sober Living by the Sea

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I deleted this as an expired Prod and subsequently userfied it at the creator's request. It has now been reintroduced to article space after some improvements. This is a courtesy note because you had previous concerns; please feel free to act as you see appropriate. TerriersFan (talk) 18:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Integrity Media/Integrity Music

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I saw you deleted these as G11s. I'd like to strip them of promotion and restore them. Chubbles (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I didn't delete the Integrity Media article (which had no independent WP:RS but eight external links to company websites). I deleted Integrity Music per {{db-g8}} as a broken redirect to the deleted article. – Athaenara ✉ 20:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, sorry. Chubbles (talk)

Deleted Article: ITMA (Internationale Textilmaschinen Ausstellung)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Athaenara, my article was deleted by you sometime in August. I've edited the article and would need your help to review if there's any issue with it. Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MPIntl/ITMA_%28Internationale_Textilmaschinen_Ausstellung%29 Your help is greatly appreciated. Thank you! MPIntl (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is a Wikipedia user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Athaenara/Archive_9.

Add topic