Artemis Andromeda

Welcome to my talk page

Hi, how is your day going?

---

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1774 establishments in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealt

A tag has been placed on Category:1774 establishments in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergiusz Żymełka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Names

The point you made w.r.t. Bismarck Sea has been shifted to a note and made more neutral. You can do more research as to when various languages changed the name if you wish to improve the note. I have a CoI as relatives Polish so might not have made changes neutral enough to please some. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin)

On 2 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Żeromski Park, the second-largest park in Szczecin, Poland, used to be a cemetery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stefan Żeromski Park (Szczecin)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Excellent work! Feel free to put up your articles on Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge‎!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Hii :) Thank you very much, I will gladly join in <3 I will also try to add all applicable articles I wrote so far later this week <3 Artemis Andromeda (talk) 18:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Warsaw areas

Hi, I just wanted to express my thanks for your contributions to Warsaw-related matters and its areas/districts/suburbs. Keep up the good work, especially with the creation of new pages. :) Merangs (talk) 22:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

@Merangs Thank you very much <3 Trying to do my best to contribute as I can. It's nice to be noticed for my work :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

@Merangs also, if you want, I could always use help in writing more articles about Warsaw :) Becouse I will be honest, it's a huge city and I'm sadly only one person Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Beatles

Thanks for creating The Beatles Statue (Liverpool), but please go back to it and fix the typos. Thanks. PamD 20:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@PamD I saw that quick fix ;) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@PamD ok, I did fix the typos, I hope I cought all of them this time Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

OK, so I fix my own typos even on talk pages! But I'm on my phone, and there just seemed too many to fix in that article of yours. PamD 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit conflict! PamD 20:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

4 typos left in "Characteristics", I reckon. PamD 20:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For creating so many great articles (I saw your reddit post). Keep up the good work. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 13:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Blaze Wolf, thank you very much. That's very nice from you <3 Artemis Andromeda (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

UPA article

Would you be able to look at one issue in the UPA article, I wrote about this on the talk page there, but no long-term editor removed it, and since you edited the Wołyń Massacre article you are probably familiar with the topic. There is a section called Commemoration in Ukraine and in it there is a picture of Ukrainian minority in Przemyśl with UPA flags. This should be removed because Przemyśl is not in Ukraine. I don't understand why no one responded and fixed it because this is really obvious inacuracy. 94.172.109.57 (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Also, I just noticed that on Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia someone changed the intro to the article, which contains made up terms: "The Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia (Polish: rzeź wołyńska), also known as the Volhynian tragedy (Ukrainian: Воли́нська траге́дія, romanized: Volynsʹka trahediya), the Volhynian–Galician slaughter (Polish: rzeź wołyńsko-galicyjska)". In Polish the name is "Volhynian slaughter" not "Volhynian–Galician slaughter". Also, this should be moved up, not sure why you have "(Polish: rzeź wołyńska)" right after Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia with out what happened to lit. 'Volhynian slaughter' in bold letters. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi, yeah, I agree that the name should be "Volhynian massacre" not "Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia". Also, Volhynian–Galician massacre is also used in Polish, it's just less popular (but is for example used by IPN and some historians), and in English, term "rzeź" is translated to "massacre" and not to more direct "slaughter". And going back to the first message. I think you are right that a picture from Ukraine would be more appropriate. I guess the picture of Przemysl was simply used becouse it shows the point author tried to make (shows Ukrainian demonstrators celebrating UPA). And, I think Przemysl had this kind of celebrations is becouse while it's in Poland, it is right on Ukrainian border, and has quite sizable Ukrainian minority. And, also, I should point out that I'm probably not the best person to ask, as I'm not really an expert on Volhynian massacre or WW2 history in general. I only have passing knowledge of it. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for looking into the above listed issues, as for the UPA article, I'm a bit concerned that there are some undertones to that image from Przemyśl, as some far-right Ukrainian nationalist groups claim that Przemyśl should be part of Ukraine, that is why I think this image should be taken out. The section only talks about "Commemoration in Ukraine" and the actual text only covers that aspect, and not in other places where Ukrainians are found like Poland, Canada or even the US. I would call the inclusion of that image rather controversial. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Just to close my comment, I think Wikipedia should avoid such inaccuracies, at the most basic level the image is not directly referenced in the text and is out of place, that's all. So, this is just a editorial fix. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

"Jerzy Waszyngton" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jerzy Waszyngton has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 16 § Jerzy Waszyngton until a consensus is reached. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 03:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Great work with all your recently created articles. Don't forget to also categorize your articles on the talk page. You've missed this out on every one that you've created. It's very important. JeyReydar97 (talk) 20:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polish Soldier Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's Gate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, and happy winter holiday season to you too :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Apollo Bas(s)in

Hi Artemis Andromeda. I removed the name "Apollo Bassin" from the link to Bassin d'Apollon at Amphitrite Fountain because it is not correct, as far as I can tell. The direct English translation would be Apollo Basin, but a better translation would be Apollo Fountain -- either of those would be better than the current one. GanzKnusper (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I sound bossy here, that wasn't my intention! Bassin is also fine. GanzKnusper (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

@GanzKnusper Nah, it's fine. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I just wanted to use English name instead of French one, since in my opinion it's wierd that some sculptures on the Wiki (like those in Poland) get their names translated, but those in France, don't. I belive it's arbitrary, and wanted to keep consistent with using English names within the article. Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 17:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

@Remsense Um, excuse me? What is this message about? I do not belive I have done anything considered "disruptive". If you are going to accuse me, at least tell me what exacly you are accusing me off instead pasting this template, not even mentioning which edit caused you to take such actions. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

January 2025

Can you please explain your edits to Template:Gmina Supraśl, Grabówka, Białystok County, Henrykowo, Podlaskie Voivodeship, Sobolewo, Białystok County, Sowlany and Zaścianki, Podlaskie Voivodeship? Apart from the edit summary for the template, where you say "Administrative changes", you have not provided edit summaries for any of these changes. Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Kiwipete Hi, ofcourse. As of 1 January 2025, those villages are part of Gmina Grabówka. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks. That should have been mentioned in your edit summaries. Kiwipete (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

Your additions in this edit here, have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.)

To see the possible source of the copyrighted text, look in the edit summary which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. There should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation, set off using the blockquote template. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 21:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick I was clearly placing text from the source so I could later use information from it in the article. And it was done in a draft... Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick please revert this... I spent lot's of time looking for sources and working on this article, and you jsut deleted it with your faulty bot, destroying all my hard work. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Not to mention that you not only deleted "copyrighted material" (a quote form a newspaper), but also, everything else I wrote in the draft.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick if you canon revert it, at least give me the text you deleted and blocked from undoing, so I can rewritte and republish it Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I responded on my talk page. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

To make it easier I'll copy my response here as well:

I'm puzzled that you say it was "just a quote from a newspaper". That's exactly what is meant by violation of copyright rules. It is permitted to use short quotes if enclosed in quotation marks or set off as a block quote and if they are properly sourced neither of which apply here.

You seem to be under the impression that it's okay to have copyrighted material in a draft. It is not. It's never a good practice to start with copyrighted material and massage it but if you must, do it in an off-line editor.

My reversion may have picked up otherwise acceptable edits because it's standard practice to revert all consecutive edits by the same editor. I can send you the material but you need to turn on your email option in your preferences so that I can send it to you via email. Alternatively, and more easily for you, I turned off the code which hides the edits so you can recover the edits yourself. Let me know when you are done so I can turn back on the revision deletion code. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

ok, done, you can close it Artemis Andromeda (talk) 04:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

thanks S Philbrick(Talk) 15:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:States and territories established in 2025

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories established in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. harrz ^talk 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)