Antrotherkus

Home

Talk

Awards

Sandbox

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Algeria, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Oh ok. Antrotherkus (Talk to me!) 23:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
22		Alb-Donau-Kreis (talk)	Add sources
58		Charleston in the American Civil War (talk)	Add sources
54		Guayana Region, Venezuela (talk)	Add sources
4		Eurotowns (talk)	Add sources
36		NANA Regional Corporation (talk)	Add sources
8,290		Alaska (talk)	Add sources
5,168		Free and open-source software (talk)	Cleanup
850		Cat communication (talk)	Cleanup
188		Seward, Alaska (talk)	Cleanup
1,026		Feral cat (talk)	Expand
156		Cats in Australia (talk)	Expand
148		Partition and secession in California (talk)	Expand
167		Burmilla (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
522		Cat behavior (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19		The 13th Regional Corporation (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
52		Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (talk)	Merge
344		KDE Plasma 5 (talk)	Merge
790		Spanning Tree Protocol (talk)	Merge
865		Curd (talk)	Wikify
244		Dog crossbreed (talk)	Wikify
112		Alphablocks (talk)	Wikify
8		Nabada (talk)	Orphan
2		Jochen Claussen-Finks (talk)	Orphan
2		El Colecio (talk)	Orphan
10		Emory M. Thomas (talk)	Stub
32		Lineage (genetic) (talk)	Stub
50		Cyber Group Studios (talk)	Stub
4		Neenstetten (talk)	Stub
27		Foreign White (talk)	Stub
4		Donau-Iller-Nahverkehrsverbund (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Explaining your edits

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! — Manticore 21:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Antrotherkus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Manticore 21:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mᴀɴᴛɪᴄᴏʀᴇ! I'll go ahead and summarize my edits from now on. Also, thanks for informing me as to what "minor edit" actually meant. — Antrotherkus ^{Talk to me!} 23:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

"Beam attack" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Beam attack has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Beam attack until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

"Bingus" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bingus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Bingus until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Please be more careful when fulfilling Edit Requests

Hello, I noticed that you recently fulfilled edit requests made by an editor who has a long history of inaccurate and/or unreliable sourcing. Apparently you did not read all the comments on the La Rambla Building article, and you reinstated the original request with the wrong page numbers. When fulfilling these requests, you need to actually read the sources and compare them to the text that is requested to make certain that the two line up, rather than just making a change without checking. Could you please go back over the other articles by the same editor to make sure you did those correctly? And please read the talk page comments first. There has been a team of editors working to mentor the article creator for years on how to properly source content. Fulfilling an edit request that is wrong is not constructive. Please be more careful in the future and double check your work and the requester's work before implementing changes. Thank you. Courtesy ping @Graywalls Netherzone (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Also a problem with Seven Arts article - you reinstated incorrect page numbers. Netherzone (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

And wrong page numbers on the Reardon Building article. You need to read the edit requests, talk page discussions and check the text against the sources before implementing changes. Netherzone (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

You also completed an edit request on Los Laureles Lodge but according to the talk page discussion, there was not yet consensus for the edit to be made. Please be more careful in the future. Netherzone (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for not reading the discussions attached to edit requests before. I shall do so in the future. Thank you. — Antrotherkus ^{Talk to me!} 18:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks in advance! Netherzone (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:FRIPON has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FRIPON. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FRIPON has been accepted

FRIPON, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit to Dubidubidu

Hello. Regarding this edit, linking to well-known countries like Spain, Japan and Chile is considered WP:OVERLINKING. Also, songs are included on albums, not "in" them. Thanks. Ss112 15:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay! Antrotherkus 16:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

"The Three Mage-Sisters" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Three Mage-Sisters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 8 § The Three Mage-Sisters until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about WhyOnEarthWouldIWantToContributeToaWiki

Hello, Antrotherkus

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EggRoll97 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect WhyOnEarthWouldIWantToContributeToaWiki, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 26 § WhyOnEarthWouldIWantToContributeToaWiki.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|EggRoll97}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

EggRoll97 ^(talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)