Wikipedia

Talk:Wilsonville, Oregon

Latest comment: 5 days ago by Z1720 in topic GA Reassessment
Learn more about this page
Good articleWilsonville, Oregon has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Improvement checklist

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

To work on:

  • More cites, fix old cites
  • Culture section: parks, media, library (move some info from gov), farmer's market, Art Walk, Boones Ferry Days
  • Government: city, state, regional, fed
  • Prose for econ, add shopping component
  • Prose for education
  • Notable people

Should be enough for B class. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Population changes

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

First, if you update/change something that is sourced, you have to update the source too, and it must be sourced. Secondly, it is not "confirmed" as these are all estimates. The closest to confirmation comes from the census every ten years when they go around and try to count everyone. But even then, the census folks do some calculations, but close enough. And, all the estimates usually take a little time to calculate, thus even if you had a newer number it would likely be for 2008, as it is the numbers from the PRC at Portland State (those come out 12/15 each year and are an estimate of the population as of 7/1 of earlier that year). Lastly, we usually leave the infobox number as the last census as the population density numbers relate to that number, thus you will have discrepancies if you only update one. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wilsonville, Oregon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is an interesting and reasonably well-written and referenced article about a small town, bedroom community. I wouldn't exactly call the prose, "brilliant", so it's still a bit off from FA quality, but I think it meets the GA standard. The reading can get a little dry at times, and sometimes you feel like your just reading the timeline written out in paragraph form. So moving forward, it might be nice to see this better weaved in and telling a bit more of a story about the town's development. But at this stage of the game, I think it meets the minimum standard for GA.

Reference citations meet the guidelines, as the article is very well-sourced.

The article is overall complete, although the 'culture' section could use more work in development. While I don't expect too much on culture for a small community like this, it might be nice to see more about some local cultural events & fairs, and you might integrate the 'notable people' section into this as well, discussing how some of those notables have contributed to the town's culture. You can also move the part about the library into the education section, and maybe start out the culture section with something other than media, since most of the media seems to be imported from nearby Portland.

All of the images in the article meet the tagging criteria, though it might be nice to use images with more people, as most of the images are just of structures and parks. While a lot of the structures are new, the lack of people in the images almost makes it look like a ghost town, which is a bit eerie.

I don't see any major WP:NPOV or edit-warring/stability issues, so the article passes those criteria easily. Most editing was done by one user.

Overall, it's a nice piece of work, and certainly meets the GA criteria. Wouldn't put the A-class rating on it quite yet, since it's, as I've said, a little dry. But I think if you can spruce it up with a bit more culture and flavor, it could get up to FA-class eventually. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review and the promotion. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Climate

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is the Wilsonville article using climate information for Sheridan, a city 40 miles away? 98.232.193.99 (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dunno. I'll try to fix that. Jsayre64 (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Wilsonville, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Wilsonville, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seal or flag

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image listed as the seal of Wilsonville looks more like a flag. Is it actually the seal? ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 07:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • The "History" section ends in 2007, and I think more recent information should be included.
  • The "Demographics" section is largely uncited and contains a lot of information about the 2000 and 2010 censuses. I think this section can be reduced and should be cited more effectively.
  • The Lead needs to be updated with the latest demographic information.
  • There are some uncited statements in other areas of the article not indicated above.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
Latest comment: 5 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Wilsonville, Oregon

edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending

The "History" section ends in 2007, and I think more recent information should be included. The "Demographics" section is largely uncited and contains a lot of information about the 2000 and 2010 censuses. I think this section can be reduced and should be cited more effectively. The lead needs to be updated with the latest demographic information. There are some uncited statements in other areas of the article not indicated above. Z1720 (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Keep as all of the issues have now been addressed due to the hardwork of various editors. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wilsonville,_Oregon&oldid=1263901143"