Talk:Walter v Lane

Latest comment: 2 years ago by DuncanHill in topic Who was Walter?

-- 11(2) CDPA 1988 has nothing to do with Walter v Lane --

It's a provision about the ownership of employee's works in the course of their employment. I'm going to take that part out.

11.— First ownership of copyright. (1) The author of a work is the first owner of any copyright in it, subject to the following provisions. (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [, or a film, ] 27 is made by an employee in the course of his employment, his employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work subject to any agreement to the contrary. (3) This section does not apply to Crown copyright or Parliamentary copyright (see sections 163 and 165) or to copyright which subsists by virtue of section 168 (copyright of certain international organisations). 81.132.199.147 (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Who was Lane?

edit

Who was Lane? What was the title of his book? DuncanHill (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ah, he was John Lane (publisher) and the book was Appreciations and Addresses, Delivered by Lord Rosebery. DuncanHill (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Who was Walter?

edit

So who was Walter? DuncanHill (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Arthur Fraser Walter. DuncanHill (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply