This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Total Mozambique
editAn ISIS splinter group (Al Shabob) (sp?) was active in an area where Total employees were developing infrastructure for gas. This was a substantial property with over 130 employees from overseas, as well as other local employees. Despite the warning signs of eminent attack, as well as long term threats, insufficient arrangements were made for these contract employees safety. Despite the attempts of an underfunded and under gunned security force (helicopters and all), the response was inadequate. Ukrainian security contractors with heavy troop helicopters and very adequate arms declined moving to remove the personnel they were contracted to protect, some 12 miles away. Nor did the Mozambique army. After 3 days the unarmed contractors, and locals, made a run for safety in private vehicles. About half survived. The preferred method of killing by the extremists was machete beheading, rather than gunshot execution. Total has declined compensation to the families of the victims. This is a significant event, and should not be buried. 69.178.94.180 (talk) 03:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Merge proposal
edit- @BoraVoro: You placed one template at Total Italia, but not on the TotalEnergies page. You've also given no case for the merge, and it doesn't seem at all obvious given that the company merged to TotalErg, that therefore seems like the more appropriate target. Thoughts? Klbrain (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see. It's better to merge to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TotalErg. Should I place a template ? BoraVoro (talk) 08:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; I've done this. So, the proposal is to merge Total Italia to TotalErg given that there was a company merge, and there's not enough on the Italia page to justify a stand-alone article. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- However, I agree that it might be best to merge TotalEnergies Italia to TotalEnergies (subsidiary merge to parent company; short text and context). It is a bit of a tangle! Klbrain (talk) 10:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; I've done this. So, the proposal is to merge Total Italia to TotalErg given that there was a company merge, and there's not enough on the Italia page to justify a stand-alone article. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I see. It's better to merge to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TotalErg. Should I place a template ? BoraVoro (talk) 08:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)