Talk:Stump the Schwab
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Donaldd23 (talk · contribs) on 28 February 2024. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editAnyone have a list of all the people who have stumped the Schwab?
Here are two people that stumped the Schwab twice: Joel Radwanski from Chicago, Illinois, and Brian Sandalow from Skokie, Illinois.
Do we really need an "unsourced" tag? It's a TV show. We source it by watching the show!Gabefarkas 04:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know when Season 5 casting begins? ~~Mark, 3 March 2007
Fair use rationale for Image:Schwab logo.gif
edit
Image:Schwab logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Appropriate detail?
editI'm wondering how it's encyclopedic to have this much detail on a game show on a cable channel? Detail on how each round works, names of all the winners. Even Jeopardy doesn't have so much detail. Shouldn't an encyclopedia have some perspective and proportionality? I admit the dedication of any set of fans, but this seems beyond what's appropriate for an encyclopedia, by Wikipedia standards.12.163.85.138 03:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
How is being gay a round? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.112.131.103 (talk) 05:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Schwab logo.gif
edit Image:Schwab logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.