Talk:Stacy Osei-Kuffour
Latest comment: 3 years ago by C.Fred in topic Requested move 20 July 2021
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Requested move 20 July 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved: change seems obvious and non-controversial. Contact me if there are objections, and I'll re-open —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC). —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to Stacy Osei-Kuffour has been carried out. |
Stacy Amma Osei-Kuffour → Stacy Osei-Kuffour – The person in question has typically been credited as "Stacy Osei-Kuffour", per Watchmen and her other credits linked on her page, and per WP:COMMONNAME. We typically don't include middle names in the article title. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Admin's comment. This seems an obvious and non-controversial move. Are there objections to the move? —C.Fred (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.