This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Overall, it's well-written with no prose, image, neutrality, or stability issues evident. However, one minor verifiability issue: and the 36th most seen programme overall during the week it aired. (source [1]) – it seems that the list is cutoff at the top 30, or am I missing something in the interface?
What I meant was that on the source, there are six tables with a top 30 list. I combined where Spooks was in the first one (25th), then look at the other tables to see how many have programmes seen by more than 5.91 million viewers the week it aired. If you still feel this is still complicated, I will remove it. -- MatthewRD13:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply